Luminous Landscape Forum

Equipment & Techniques => Medium Format / Film / Digital Backs – and Large Sensor Photography => Topic started by: TechTalk on September 28, 2012, 01:49:36 pm

Title: Hasselblad HTS 1.5 available in U.S. market again
Post by: TechTalk on September 28, 2012, 01:49:36 pm
The patent dispute that temporarily halted the sale of the Hasselblad HTS 1.5 tilt/shift adapter in the U.S. market has been settled by a ruling in Hasselblad’s favor. The HTS 1.5 is now available for purchase in the U.S.
Title: Re: Hasselblad HTS 1.5 available in U.S. market again
Post by: FredBGG on September 29, 2012, 03:14:54 am
The patent dispute that temporarily halted the sale of the Hasselblad HTS 1.5 tilt/shift adapter in the U.S. market has been settled by a ruling in Hasselblad’s favor. The HTS 1.5 is now available for purchase in the U.S.

Can you tell us more about the infringement case....
Title: Re: Hasselblad HTS 1.5 available in U.S. market again
Post by: jduncan on September 29, 2012, 09:28:33 am
The patent dispute that temporarily halted the sale of the Hasselblad HTS 1.5 tilt/shift adapter in the U.S. market has been settled by a ruling in Hasselblad’s favor. The HTS 1.5 is now available for purchase in the U.S.

This is great news. Do you have the source?

Thanks,

J. Duncan
Title: Re: Hasselblad HTS 1.5 available in U.S. market again
Post by: oldmanman on September 29, 2012, 04:34:02 pm
(attached documents)
Title: Re: Hasselblad HTS 1.5 available in U.S. market again
Post by: Dustbak on September 30, 2012, 10:01:25 am
Well, these documents leave not much room for interpretation. Good to see that fraudulent and frivolous litigation is not rewarded. The plaintiff appears to be a total sleez bag...
Title: Re: Hasselblad HTS 1.5 available in U.S. market again
Post by: David Watson on October 01, 2012, 04:53:38 pm
Well, these documents leave not much room for interpretation. Good to see that fraudulent and frivolous litigation is not rewarded. The plaintiff appears to be a total sleez bag...

Well I am not sure about that.  It seems to me that, given the date of the original patent (1995) there may well be a strong argument in favour of the plaintiff.  Fortunately for Hasselblad he either chose to represent himself, in part, or alternatively could not afford expert legal and technical advice.  Seems to me, rather like taking sides in a divorce, that there is an argument to be made for both sides.  In Hasselblad's shoes I may have taken the option of paying what would have probably been a fraction of the legal fees to settle. I just hate giving money to lawyers but I also agree that one should not accede to what is effectively blackmail.