Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Timo Löfgren on November 28, 2010, 04:14:45 am

Title: Ice Age
Post by: Timo Löfgren on November 28, 2010, 04:14:45 am

.......

Title: Re: Ice Age
Post by: Josh-H on November 28, 2010, 04:58:15 am

Beautiful.

Title: Re: Ice Age
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on November 28, 2010, 08:01:57 am

Quote from: Josh-H on November 28, 2010, 04:58:15 am

Beautiful.

+1.

Title: Re: Ice Age
Post by: popnfresh on November 29, 2010, 09:10:57 am

I like the top half of the image very much. The bottom half isn't working for me.

Title: Re: Ice Age
Post by: Bruce Cox on November 29, 2010, 11:24:06 am

I like it, though queued by popnfresh, I see the water ice below center vertically and in the middle laterally as less connected than the other parts.  I like the grass.  Bruce

Title: Re: Ice Age
Post by: David Saffir on December 06, 2010, 12:14:57 am

I tend to agree - a crop right below the line of black rocks could be very interesting.


David Saffir
GuruShots Photo Critique  (http://www.gurushots.com) -  a contributor on Gurushots, a new resource for creative photographers

Title: Re: Ice Age
Post by: John R Smith on December 06, 2010, 04:37:12 am

Timo

Ignore these fools  :D - don't change a thing! It's a superb landscape, with great framing and beautiful handling of the tonal range. A picture I would be proud to have made.

Actually, it's a bit too good to be on here. You're making my own stuff look crap, dammit. Timo, you're banned . . . .

John

Title: Re: Ice Age
Post by: stamper on December 06, 2010, 10:11:32 am

I think the bottom half is needed to lead your eyes into the scene. Composition is spot on. Toning is very good and not over saturated. :)