Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Medium Format / Film / Digital Backs – and Large Sensor Photography => Topic started by: narikin on February 01, 2010, 05:52:14 pm
-
if I were to be shooting in the 90-100mm range, which Mamiya zoom should I be buying - the 75-150mm or the 55-110mm?
any ideas which has the better reputation for sharpness on a digital back?
the 75-150 is much pricier in the marketplace, so presumably is better, or rarer?
but is there really that much difference?
-
if I were to be shooting in the 90-100mm range, which Mamiya zoom should I be buying - the 75-150mm or the 55-110mm?
any ideas which has the better reputation for sharpness on a digital back?
the 75-150 is about 6x the price in the marketplace, so presumably its a lot better, but... is there really that much difference?
The 75-150 is a D lens and is significantly better than the 55-110 at the wider apertures. If you are stopping down a lot, then the 55-100 is quite good and a relative bargain. The 75-150 also renders a bit more contrast if that matters to you My 75-150 is quite usable at f5.6, where the 55-110 I had needed to be stopped down to f8 or more to get consistently good results.
PS: There is a lot more variability in the 55-110 zoom too, so be prepared to trial a few copies to find a good one.
-
if I were to be shooting in the 90-100mm range, which Mamiya zoom should I be buying - the 75-150mm or the 55-110mm?
any ideas which has the better reputation for sharpness on a digital back?
the 75-150 is much pricier in the marketplace, so presumably is better, or rarer?
but is there really that much difference?
If you can afford it get the 75-150 excellent lens even wide open.
Cheaper alternative if you dont mind manual focus is the 120mm macro. It is f/4 and razor sharp wide open and pretty cheap used.
-
55-110 stinks at anything below f8 and is slow as a dog. Also does not focus close at all.
Worst lens I have used.
Use primes if possible. Have never tried the 75 150 but supposedly good. But still slow.
Snook
-
Don't forget the 105-210, which is about as sharp as my 75-150. Less expensive than the 75-150. 55-110 got sold on ebay as the quality was too poor to use.
Paul
55-110 stinks at anything below f8 and is slow as a dog. Also does not focus close at all.
Worst lens I have used.
Use primes if possible. Have never tried the 75 150 but supposedly good. But still slow.
Snook