Luminous Landscape Forum

Raw & Post Processing, Printing => Adobe Lightroom Q&A => Topic started by: lluis on October 22, 2009, 10:09:33 am

Title: RAW vs DNG
Post by: lluis on October 22, 2009, 10:09:33 am

Dear users,

Should I use RAW files or convert previously to DNG?
I understand DNG format is not proprietary so it'll be able to be read by any converter anytime, so converting files to DNG seems obvious to me. In fact I do it.
But some photographers don't or at least some of them see some disadvantages. Which are the advantages and disadvantages of converting to DNG?

Thanks in advance.

Lluis

Title: RAW vs DNG
Post by: Nick Rains on October 22, 2009, 11:06:51 am

A search through these forums will reveal a huge amount of discussion on this exact question.

Title: RAW vs DNG
Post by: deejjjaaaa on October 22, 2009, 12:08:57 pm

Quote from: lluis

so it'll be able to be read by any converter anytime

this is not correct - not all raw converters (so far) will be able to read your DNG file (DxO for example) and not all that will be able to read it have full functionality enabled w/ DNG file (C1 does not do CA/PF corrections for DNG for example)...

Title: RAW vs DNG
Post by: DarkPenguin on October 22, 2009, 12:19:21 pm

It seems like it should be a win but only a few raw converters support DNG.  And even if that isn't a problem now it could be in the future.  In the case of Canon they didn't do lens corrections in DPP so there was no problem converting to DNG.  But those scamps went and added lens corrections to DPP.  Can't use those with the DNG files.  (It would be nice if canon gave those corrections to Adobe like Panasonic did.)