Luminous Landscape Forum

Raw & Post Processing, Printing => Printing: Printers, Papers and Inks => Topic started by: Doombrain on July 08, 2009, 04:29:13 am

Title: LOGO Classic vs. Choma Plus
Post by: Doombrain on July 08, 2009, 04:29:13 am

Anyone using LOGO Chroma Plus to build photographic output profiles?

After testing a new iSis and having a play in PM5 I printed a few images out with a Chroma Plus ICC and the output if fantastic.

Are there any opinions on Classic vs. Chorma Plus?

Title: LOGO Classic vs. Choma Plus
Post by: Wayne Fox on July 08, 2009, 12:32:55 pm

Quote from: Doombrain

Anyone using LOGO Chroma Plus to build photographic output profiles?

After testing a new iSis and having a play in PM5 I printed a few images out with a Chroma Plus ICC and the output if fantastic.

Are there any opinions on Classic vs. Chorma Plus?

I hardly ever use the perceptual rendering intent anymore when printing, so this doesn't affect the output.  That being said my profiles are built with Chroma Plus and on the occasional print where I use perceptual I do like the results.

Title: LOGO Classic vs. Choma Plus
Post by: Doombrain on July 09, 2009, 11:13:40 am

Agreed, the results are very pleasing.

Title: LOGO Classic vs. Choma Plus
Post by: JeffKohn on July 09, 2009, 03:24:28 pm

Generate a profile for each perceptual mapping. Mostly I use rel-col, but on the rare occasions when I use perceptual I'll soft-proof with each profile and see which one looks best. It's dependent on the image, but usually I prefer Chroma-Plus or Colorful.

Title: LOGO Classic vs. Choma Plus
Post by: neil snape on July 09, 2009, 05:00:55 pm

I used to use Chroma Plus for proofing and CMYK profiles. I haven't used Classic other than testing. In theory only the Perceptual tables are calculated differently .

So much for theory though as you better check your relative tables between Colorful and Chroma Plus. Remember that Absolute is calculated from the relative table plus white of the paper!