Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Medium Format / Film / Digital Backs – and Large Sensor Photography => Topic started by: david o on February 05, 2007, 08:45:49 pm
-
I saw those two auction, from supposely two differetns sellers, on eBay about a Rollei 6008 AF bundle DB 20p...
but I noticed something odd.
If you check the links, and look at the pics of the item it will be obvious that something is weird...
http://cgi.ebay.ca/MINT-Rollei-6008-AF-db2...1QQcmdZViewItem (http://cgi.ebay.ca/MINT-Rollei-6008-AF-db20-Digital-Back-Bundle-EXTRAS_W0QQitemZ270086111013QQihZ017QQcategoryZ3354QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem)
http://cgi.ebay.ca/Rollei-6008-AF-and-DB20...1QQcmdZViewItem (http://cgi.ebay.ca/Rollei-6008-AF-and-DB20P-Digital-Back_W0QQitemZ160081183788QQihZ006QQcategoryZ3354QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem)
What do you think...
thanks.
-
Neither link worked for me
-
try those...
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewIt...em=160081183788 (http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160081183788)
http://cgi.ebay.ca/MINT-Rollei-6008-AF-db2...1QQcmdZViewItem (http://cgi.ebay.ca/MINT-Rollei-6008-AF-db20-Digital-Back-Bundle-EXTRAS_W0QQitemZ270086111013QQihZ017QQcategoryZ3354QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem)
Graham you know that I'm looking for something close to that...
i tried from "preview post", and it worked...
-
First link worked. Second is still incorrect.
-
for the second link, I did copy the link and then paste it...
I tried several time and it doesn't work as soon as it's on the post.
Search 6008AF and you may find it...
thanks for the try anyhow.
-
try posting just the item numbers for both auctions
-
1)
270086111013
2)
160081183788
-
The photos are totally different. What am I missing?
-
The photos are totally different. What am I missing?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=99394\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
The one of the entire camera on the white fabric... the color balance is different, bt it is the same the others are differents
-
Well spotted! I'm guessing that 270086111013 is the owner of the photos because he has a few of them taken on the same white cloth.
The other ad doesn't look suspect otherwise. Perhaps they just googled for images because they didn't want to shoot their own. This ad seems to have been posted later too, which just supports the theory. Odd, and I can understand your concern.