Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: David Eckels on March 03, 2021, 11:02:15 am
-
Have at it. ;D
-
must be horrible to live there...;)
-
It does look fake.
-
I much prefer the Saguaros with no sky.
-
I agree.
-
Looking at it this morning, the land is way too dark.
As for the sky, it was an experiment, oh well 8)
Thanks for the comments guys.
Pieter, I had enough snow and cold after 35 years!
-
Well I didn't realize the sky was fake until after looking. But it's so dark in the foreground that there's nothing for me to work with. And that's probably done to match with that sky, so it kind of works that way if all you're trying to do is trick me.
-
Well I didn't realize the sky was fake until after looking. But it's so dark in the foreground that there's nothing for me to work with. And that's probably done to match with that sky, so it kind of works that way if all you're trying to do is trick me.
I think it was an interesting exercise, but in retrospect, I didn't do enough to blend land and sky. If I had, perhaps I could have really tricked you! ;)
-
Pieter, I had enough snow and cold after 35 years!
David,
That's ok. Weakness is not a fault. ; )
Peter
-
Yeah, needs some work. And do I recognize that particular sky from Photoshop?
I used one of theirs trying out that new feature with a real estate shot and found it acceptable and the client loved it.
It has its place but I'm not convinced this image is it. :)
-
Peter, too funny!
Matt, agree.
-
Looking at it this morning, the land is way too dark.
As for the sky, it was an experiment, oh well 8)
Thanks for the comments guys.
Pieter, I had enough snow and cold after 35 years!
I mean; must be horrible living under a fake sky...
-
I mean; must be horrible living under a fake sky...
:( Sadly, there are so many here, I've lost count ;)