Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: KLaban on November 15, 2020, 02:41:31 pm
-
Primordial.
(https://www.keithlaban.co.uk/Primordial.jpg)
-
Another great one for the collection.
-
Another great one for the collection.
Agreed. However it looks beautiful, exotic, intricate, complex – which doesn't connote primordial to me.
-
Agreed. However it looks beautiful, exotic, intricate, complex – which doesn't connote primordial to me.
Ditto on part of that. It is hard to convey "primordial." I would say the image is so well done that its overall beauty causes us to overlook the death and skeletal remains of the crustacean. Although not a fossil, it does remind me of one and that is primordial to me.
JR
-
Excellent with the rust-colored background…
-
Thanks again all.
I have to admit that this creature wouldn't meet the true definition of 'Primordial', but as John R has suggested my reference was to the fossil-like qualities of these ancient and beautiful creatures.
-
Becoming a strong serie.
what is the size?
-
Becoming a strong serie.
what is the size?
Thanks.
I take it you're referring to the size of the creature which is around 4 inches in length.
I used my trusty old Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 Ai-S - well, actually it's brand new as my old copy developed faults which were uneconomical to repair - on an Z7 with the FTZ adapter. The image needs to be seen full size to appreciate how good this comparatively ancient macro lens design really is: a true classic.
-
A good one, Keith. It's not just a dead critter. It's beautiful.
-
Thanks, Russ.