Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Jeremy Roussak on February 15, 2019, 02:57:00 pm
-
With reflection, or without?
Jeremy
-
Without.
-
Without.
+1
-
I would be tempted to agree with Slobodan and Terry, but I'm afraid that we would all be thinking the same. ;)
So I'll agree anyway.
-
Without… sorry for not being original with my choice.
-
I would be tempted to agree with Slobodan and Terry, but I'm afraid that we would all be thinking the same. ;)
So I'll agree anyway.
Me, too.
-
Without.
See what you've done, Slobodan? You've made us all think the same! :D
-
I don't think I've ever seen such unanimity of opinion in a LuLa thread!
Jeremy
-
I don't think I've ever seen such unanimity of opinion in a LuLa thread!
Jeremy
I didn’t react because I think you should go with the reflections. Even maybe only the reflection, or a part of the monkey and more of the environment.
Different than the zillion shots of those monkeys.
When I’m in front of such a ragged out subject, I do the obligatory shots and then I start freewheeling.
Maybe you have such shots as well? Maybe you want to share?
-
I didn’t react because I think you should go with the reflections. Even maybe only the reflection, or a part of the monkey and more of the environment.
Interesting thought. I rather liked the reflection, which is why I've not committed myself.
Different than the zillion shots of those monkeys.
When I’m in front of such a ragged out subject, I do the obligatory shots and then I start freewheeling.
Maybe you have such shots as well? Maybe you want to share?
I'll have a look: I certainly took an awful lot of photographs in the time I was there.
Jeremy
-
Interesting thought. I rather liked the reflection, which is why I've not committed myself.
I'll have a look: I certainly took an awful lot of photographs in the time I was there.
Jeremy
I’m certainly interested to see the broader habitat of these animals and a bit more of the context of your travels, Jeremy.