Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: armand on January 09, 2019, 01:40:42 pm

Title: smoke
Post by: armand on January 09, 2019, 01:40:42 pm
2 versions
Title: Re: smoke
Post by: petermfiore on January 09, 2019, 04:33:07 pm
Hi Armand,

Both are wonderful...because there is a choice I prefer the first. Soft and strong at the same time.

Peter
Title: Re: smoke
Post by: armand on January 09, 2019, 05:31:19 pm
Hi Armand,

Both are wonderful...because there is a choice I prefer the first. Soft and strong at the same time.

Peter

Thank you!

I think the soft comes a lot from the haze/snow and the issues the RX10 iii had on focusing at max zoom. The strong partially comes from trying to compensate for the softness. Then again, you might have something else in mind when you say soft and strong.
The second is crisper but the smoke is not as appealing.
Title: Re: smoke
Post by: francois on January 10, 2019, 05:46:10 am
My vote also goes to the first shot. I prefer the "shape" of the smoke and also the wider framing.
Title: Re: smoke
Post by: Ray on January 10, 2019, 06:18:55 am
Me too. The first version is definitely better.
Title: Re: smoke
Post by: Bob_B on January 10, 2019, 08:18:39 am
The first for me as well, largely because of the smoke's symmetry with the mountain side.
Title: Re: smoke
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on January 10, 2019, 08:22:38 am
Another vote for the first.
But the light is nice in the second.
Title: Re: smoke
Post by: JNB_Rare on January 10, 2019, 08:37:39 am
What makes the first one better (to me) is the length and direction of the plume. I like the light in the second shot better. Alas ...
Title: Re: smoke
Post by: armand on January 10, 2019, 12:16:39 pm
Thank you! Sometimes conditions don't fully cooperate. I knew that it's a good scene but many times I can't get the shot that I want.