Luminous Landscape Forum

Equipment & Techniques => Cameras, Lenses and Shooting gear => Topic started by: rethmeier on September 26, 2006, 08:58:46 pm

Title: Ultimate Point and shoot?
Post by: rethmeier on September 26, 2006, 08:58:46 pm
Will this be the ultimate Point and Shoot?


http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06092604sigmadp1.asp (http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06092604sigmadp1.asp)
Title: Ultimate Point and shoot?
Post by: augg on September 27, 2006, 06:08:02 pm
When I think of point and shoot I think of my old black hexar with the f2 lens. Why doesn't anyone make a digital point and shoot with a fast lens? (Besides the canon g5 which I do like but where are the current fast lens cameras?

dan
Title: Ultimate Point and shoot?
Post by: Andrew Teakle on September 27, 2006, 06:45:57 pm
Image quality may be superb, ergonomics sublime, size and weight unobtrusive, but I would never buy a camera with a fixed focal length and no way to change lenses. Who shoots at 28mm exclusively? Even a 3x zoom (28-84mm) would increase its usability a million-fold. Why waste all those development resources on a camera that is so restricted in its usability.  

As you might guess, I was not brought up in the Leica rangefinder school of street photography. I started with 35mm and a couple of zooms, so I've never been restricted in focal length.
Title: Ultimate Point and shoot?
Post by: ericstaud on September 27, 2006, 08:07:13 pm
"but I would never buy a camera with a fixed focal length and no way to change lenses. Who shoots at 28mm exclusively? Even a 3x zoom (28-84mm) would increase its usability a million-fold. Why waste all those development resources on a camera that is so restricted in its usability."


I took the Nikon 28mm F1.4 out of town for a weekend.  Best vacation photos I ever made.  Also went to a friends wedding that weekend and shot 100 pictures with the 1.4.  The couple was blown away by the results compared to the pro wedding shooter they hired.

Of course I usually take 2 cameras and 3 lenses everywhere I go.  But I rarely get better results than I did that 3 day weekend.

I really want to buy a DP1.  My only question is about High ASA shooting.  If it excels at 800 or 1600 It might temper the F4 limitation.

-Eric
Title: Ultimate Point and shoot?
Post by: Nill Toulme on September 27, 2006, 08:38:27 pm
Personally, I think the ultimate P&S for the time being is going to be a 400D with Sigma's just-announced 18-200 OS (image stabilized) zoom.  I want one.

Nill
~~
www.toulme.net (http://www.toulme.net)
Title: Ultimate Point and shoot?
Post by: cgf on September 30, 2006, 10:31:20 am
Quote
Will this be the ultimate Point and Shoot?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06092604sigmadp1.asp (http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06092604sigmadp1.asp)
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=77923\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


About the same size as my LX1 but with a DSLR-sized sensor and a fixed lens? They can't make this fast enough for me! My wallet feels lighter already
Title: Ultimate Point and shoot?
Post by: dbell on October 02, 2006, 09:30:08 pm
Quote
Will this be the ultimate Point and Shoot?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06092604sigmadp1.asp (http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06092604sigmadp1.asp)
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=77923\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

With that lens, it's not MY ultimate P&S. I do most of my best work with "normal" or short telephoto lenses. In 35mm format, 28 is too short for me. I don't necessarily need a zoom but I wouldn't be happy with nothing but a wide lens.  

I also want decent manual controls and an optical viewfinder (although those are less critical to me than a lens that suits what I do). When I was shooting film, a K1000 or FM2 with a fast 50mm lens was just about my perfect "walking around" camera.


--
Daniel Bell