Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: MattBurt on May 10, 2017, 05:34:29 pm
-
I shot this a couple of nights ago. It was stormy but mostly in isolated cells that I figured I could navigate around to get some interesting photos. I only got a little wet. :)
To get the brighter parts exposed correctly I had to underexpose and then bring up the shadows in post. I tried to do it in a way that doesn't look fake. Did I succeed?
(https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4182/34416667481_85b6565de5_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/UrhqbD)IMGP1294-Edit (https://flic.kr/p/UrhqbD) by Matt Burt (https://www.flickr.com/photos/mattbnet/), on Flickr
-
You got it, Matt. It's striking.
-
Looks fabulous. I can hear the rumble and the disquiet.
JR
-
You got it, Matt. It's striking.
+1
-
+2
-
+3.
-
+4
-
+5
-
Stunning sky, but the foreground strikes me as a little too light.
Jeremy
-
Jeremy has a point (vs foreground lightness) but it is beautiful with that dramatic, threatening sky.
I like it a lot.
-
Wonderful drama.
-
...a tsunami in the sky.
-
Jeremy has a point (vs foreground lightness) but it is beautiful with that dramatic, threatening sky.
I like it a lot.
I wondered if it might be. It can be a fine line. I may bring it down a little if I print this. Thanks for the input!
-
Jeremy has a point (vs foreground lightness)...
Nope.
-
+1. It's all about the sky.
-
Love it.
-
+1. It's all about the sky.
Not sure if your "+1" was for Slobodan or for me, Russ. Either way, I agree with you about the sky, which is why I thought it would be better if the foreground were a bit darker.
Jeremy