Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: chuckn on April 06, 2017, 09:30:41 pm
-
Dee's Restaurant sign. Comments....
Chuck
-
I like.
-
I like it too... Processing transforms it into a timeless image.
-
I like it too... Processing transforms it into a timeless image.
+1
-
I don't know if Dee's might possibly be/have been a local chain, but it certainly juxtaposes the independent restaurants of old against the ubiquitous, international fast-food joints of the present. As others have commented, the processing really works for the image.
-
Sorry, Chuck, but I just don't get it. There's a Dee's restaurant sign with an Arby's on the other side of the street. Dee's presumably is behind us. Maybe you were trying to do a Friedlander, but Lee's stuff usually had a point. I guess I'm just missing the point in this one.
-
Sorry, Chuck, but I just don't get it. There's a Dee's restaurant sign with an Arby's on the other side of the street. Dee's presumably is behind us. Maybe you were trying to do a Friedlander, but Lee's stuff usually had a point. I guess I'm just missing the point in this one.
Russ, no point or statement to be made. Just an interesting urban landscape that caught my eye.
Chuck
-
What I take from this pic is the possibility that Dee's may no longer exist aside from the sign.
-Dave-
-
The fact that Dee's only shows the sign while Arby's shows its building provides the desired ambiguity, IMHO.
-
Sorry, I don't "see it" either. I think Russ's critique is on point.
-
Can you reshoot it so Dees is right of the building the Dees sign is a shape on a shape very distracting. I would move to the left to separate the objects or cross the street and shoot from the other side.
-
Yeah, I'd go back and do some more "takes."
-Dave-