Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Medium Format / Film / Digital Backs – and Large Sensor Photography => Topic started by: ErikKaffehr on January 19, 2017, 12:59:29 am
-
Hi,
http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n170119_01.html
Nothing really new, but lens diagrams for the first three lenses posted.
- EFCS and ES confirmed
Lenses designed for 100 MP. (I am pretty sure that it would be future generation 44x33 mm sensor)
There is an adapter for HC-lenses
There is a view camera adapter, so the GFX can be used as a digital back.
The standard lens has an interesting optical configuration, essentially a double Gauss with a three lens optical group behind.
Best regards
Erik
-
Do we think Fuji will release on schedule? Having sold my system to buy the elusive X1D, I'm tempted to try and get my deposit back to go for this instead. At least they've committed to a wider range of lenses and gave themselves a reasonable window from announcement to delivery.
-
And the EVF appears to be 3.69 mdots.
Cheers,
Bernard
p.s.: the excitement for this new camera took me out of my cave... ;)
-
Wellcome back!
Cheers,
Erik
And the EVF appears to be 3.69 mdots.
Cheers,
Bernard
p.s.: the excitement for this new camera took me out of my cave... ;)
-
I already talked to my dealer to try one. Even to try both for a weekend. (X1D and GFX).
I think that the results will be interesting but my guess is that the X1D is sexier and smaller, but when it comes to performance the GFX just offers so much more.
We will se but very exciutimes!
Oh welcome back Bernard!
Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
-
Does anyone know how, with the GFX, we would get a remote shutter release working?
-
Does anyone know how, with the GFX, we would get a remote shutter release working?
Did you notice that it has wifi? So at the very least it'll probably work with the Fuji app.
-
Thanks.
Here is a good writeup on the camera or interesting at least.
https://jonasraskphotography.com/2017/01/19/the-fujifilm-gfx-50s-review-portable-beast/
-
That article had been referenced in the review I was reading http://www.morethanwords.be/blog//the-fujifilm-gfx-files-part-1-review
-
I'm heading to the NYC Launch event today. I'll have a lot to say about this camera and the 100F soon. Hopefully, we'll get a review unit soon too. As you know we have been following the GFX for a while. Things are going to get interesting.
-
I'm heading to the NYC Launch event today. I'll have a lot to say about this camera and the 100F soon. Hopefully, we'll get a review unit soon too. As you know we have been following the GFX for a while. Things are going to get interesting.
Yes, interesting times indeed. It's a pity for Hasselblad that they did part of the groundwork for Fuji, raising interest for mirrorless MF, and now face difficulty delivering themselves. But such is life.
One can only hope that both (before Phase One joins the pack) expand the lens lineup for those who consider investing in a new platform. Lens quality (also resistance to veiling glare) remains an important factor, and one can only hope that the Bokeh (quality of OOF areas) is very pleasing as well. This is where competition benefits the end-users, options to choose from, and a challenge for manufacturers to improve the offering.
Cheers,
Bart
-
Actually Fuji was laying the ground work on the GFX long before Hasselblads anno.
Kudos to Fuji $8995 for camera zoom and spare battery.
Hopefully Fuji did a bit more homework on supply chain economics and ship this product sooner than the 500EX flash.
Paul Caldwell
-
... It's a pity for Hasselblad that they did part of the groundwork for Fuji, raising interest for mirrorless MF, and now face difficulty delivering themselves. But such is life. ...
Cheers,
Bart
You cannot develop such a system in half a year... or a year... Both H an F have been busy with it since some years at least.
Fuji has much more experience developing a mirrorless system and as it seems can do a better offer at a lower price.
The only thing it apparently lacks is flash sync shorter than 1/125s - they could probably fix that with some dedicated lenses
-
I'm heading to the NYC Launch event today. I'll have a lot to say about this camera and the 100F soon. Hopefully, we'll get a review unit soon too. As you know we have been following the GFX for a while. Things are going to get interesting.
Someone pointed out that there is an input jack for something like a remote. It was unclear. Perhaps you can clear that up for us. I need a remote trigger for the work I do.
-
Also, comments by Alan7140 on Fotozones at this link were sobering as regards the choice between the X1D and the GFX:
http://www.fotozones.com/live/index.php?/forums/topic/61894-fuji-gfx-price/
Since they don't number their comments, the comment (the last as of this writing) starts with:
"Again, but so close to release that it's probably correct...."
It suggests that Hasselblad knew exactly what they were doing when they announced earlier than they should have, perhaps fearing that Fuji (which they knew was working on the GFX) was coming soon. Right now I have both cameras on order, but I will be canceling one, probably the X1D. I love the haptics and the form-factor, but I don't need the leaf-shutter and I like the retina-grade LCD on the GFX, the movable LCD, since I shoot all in LiveView, not to mention the stronger battery, eventual adapter for Nikon, etc.
-
Someone pointed out that there is an input jack for something like a remote. It was unclear. Perhaps you can clear that up for us. I need a remote trigger for the work I do.
In the past, Fuji has allowed remote support either through the mic port (programed to almost all remotes out there) or the USB3 port. The remote for the USB3 port is actually USB2 and takes the larger of the two ports from the USB3. I am hoping this will be the case also with the GFX as I would want intervalometer support.
Paul Caldwell
-
This is getting really interesting. I do have an X1D on order but I'm beginning to reconsider my decision for many reasons. Maybe the most important is to take a breath and step back to see where the dust settles. There are too many unknowns to make a commitment at this stage and with my confidence shaken with Hasselblad I may opt to sit on the sideline for awhile.
-
And just for a touch of humor, I probably deserve to be among the great unwashed and own a Fuji, since I am not, by nature, in the Hasselblad class of folks. LOL
-
I'm heading to the NYC Launch event today. I'll have a lot to say about this camera and the 100F soon. Hopefully, we'll get a review unit soon too. As you know we have been following the GFX for a while. Things are going to get interesting.
What's the event today? Just curious if it's open to the public. If I'm done with today's shoot in time I'd love to check it out.
-
I note the HC lens adapter and as has been asked/mentioned will this mean the HTS will work but I extend this to the CF adapter ( I know, two adapters) for V lenses I wonder?
-
Incredible bang for the buck. Looks as though it's going to be a very comprehensive system.
Just wish it was as svelte as the Hasselblad X1D.
Yes, the GFX seems to be a very well executed camera system. What Fuji has done with it is very impressive to me. It is great that we have two really good choices. There are quite distinct pluses and minuses for both systems. The DNA of both Fuji and Hasselblad comes through quite strikingly in the differences between the two systems. It appears that the GFX will work really well from an operational standpoint. Frames per second, AF performance, lots of options in the user menus, rear screen LCD resolution, etc. Fuji's greater resources and experience with mirrorless cameras shows. On the other hand, the X1D is beautifully designed, it is smaller and lighter, has a much more elegantly designed user interface, and offers "real" leaf shutter lenses with full AF. Depending upon how one prioritizes these differences, one camera or the other would make the most sense.
-
It's becoming clear that Hasselblad knowingly lied to it's customers just to get out in front of a cheaper, more fully realized alternative...
-
Yes, the GFX seems to be a very well executed camera system. What Fuji has done with it is very impressive to me. It is great that we have two really good choices. There are quite distinct pluses and minuses for both systems. The DNA of both Fuji and Hasselblad comes through quite strikingly in the differences between the two systems. It appears that the GFX will work really well from an operational standpoint. Frames per second, AF performance, lots of options in the user menus, rear screen LCD resolution, etc. Fuji's greater resources and experience with mirrorless cameras shows. On the other hand, the X1D is beautifully designed, it is smaller and lighter, has a much more elegantly designed user interface, and offers "real" leaf shutter lenses with full AF. Depending upon how one prioritizes these differences, one camera or the other would make the most sense.
Didn't they say HC lens adapter somewhere or was that wishful thinking? Wonder if that would take care of leaf shutter needs
-
Yup.
g-mount (https://www.dpreview.com/news/3019005387/fujifilm-releases-first-round-of-g-mount-medium-format-lenses)
I believe that the HC lenses are not AF on the GFX, at least at launch.
-
You really have to admire the technological prowess that Fuji brought to bear in incorporating Electronic First Curtain Shutter into the GFX. Phase, Hasselblad and Pentax have all used this sensor in cameras, and as far as I know, none of them has included EFCS. There was much skepticism expressed that it was even possible with that sensor.
-
Not to mention a full ES also.
Paul Caldwell
-
Here's the Fujifilm GFX guide and full system catalog:
http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/gfx/fujifilm_gfx_50s/pdf/index/gfx_catalogue_01.pdf