Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Landscape & Nature Photography => Topic started by: sarrasani on January 16, 2017, 10:26:14 am
-
three images from the same point of view.
35 mm. (Summicron leica-r) for 1, 10 mm. (Voigtlander) 2 and 3. 24X36 digital (A7r).
Enjoy some and/or someone of them if you want, and all the best for you,
Sandro
Your favourite? (Or less bad)
Here the "real" images, if you want to evaluate details and transitions
4k resolution 1 (https://photos.smugmug.com/Aosta-12-2016/i-m9NpQ6s/0/O/_DSC8123_DxO.jpg)
4k resolution 2 (https://photos.smugmug.com/Aosta-12-2016/i-rNvNktH/0/O/_DSC8130_DxO.jpg)
4k resolution 3 (https://photos.smugmug.com/Aosta-12-2016/i-dFMHfSz/0/O/_DSC8127_DxO.jpg)
and here the previews
-
I prefer the less exaggerated perspective in #1.
-
Very nice set but I also prefer the first one with the second being a close second. The only thing I would change is the rectangular sign on the bridge. It looks like someone left an open laptop there. I would clone it out.
-
I prefer the less exaggerated perspective in #1.
thank you much.
All the best,
sandro
-
Very nice set but I also prefer the first one with the second being a close second. The only thing I would change is the rectangular sign on the bridge. It looks like someone left an open laptop there. I would clone it out.
You are right. it's disturbing (a brass opened book, recently added....).
Thank you much, and all the best,
sandro
-
I can see the point of each image but if the bridge is really supposed to be the ultimate subject of the image then #1 is by far the best and it is a wonderful study!
Tony Jay
-
I can see the point of each image but if the bridge is really supposed to be the ultimate subject of the image then #1 is by far the best and it is a wonderful study!
Tony Jay
Thank you much! I like to capture scenes also without a clear and "no doubt" subject. But it's probably one of my weaknesses....
All the best,
sandro
-
I really like the exaggerated foreground rocks in #2. They really being me in for more eye-wandering. Nice!
-
I really like the exaggerated foreground rocks in #2. They really being me in for more eye-wandering. Nice!
+1
But I also like the water flow of the third, although it's a bit too smooth.
The first is of "a bridge". Not having been there and not knowing the significance, I find the first "nice" but not compelling.
The rocks of the second are a bit over-exaggerated, but certainly, as Matt points out, more interesting.
-
I really like the exaggerated foreground rocks in #2. They really being me in for more eye-wandering. Nice!
Thank you much!
All the best,
sandro
-
+1
But I also like the water flow of the third, although it's a bit too smooth.
The first is of "a bridge". Not having been there and not knowing the significance, I find the first "nice" but not compelling.
The rocks of the second are a bit over-exaggerated, but certainly, as Matt points out, more interesting.
Thank you much luxborealis, and all the best,
sandro
-
I really like the exaggerated foreground rocks in #2. They really being me in for more eye-wandering. Nice!
Yes, I agree. Good one.
-
I really like the exaggerated foreground rocks in #2. They really being me in for more eye-wandering. Nice!
+1
Number one seems too typical. The way that the rocks lead into the center and all the lines lead me into the bridge makes #2 the clear winner for me. Also something about the shadows/processing is just done right for me.