Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Chairman Bill on January 17, 2016, 05:11:19 am
-
An ancient standing stone, more recently used as a parish boundary marker
-
And a mono version
-
The mono for me, but only by a whisker. Both are fine.
-
B/W for me too.
-
B/W for me too.
And me.
-
And me.
B/W is a powerful abstraction but I think the colour is strong too.
-
The colour version is a beauty.
-
The b&w version is overly dramatic, in particular the sky, thus competing with the main point of interest: the stone.
-
Well, I can't argue with masters like Rajan, Slobodan, and Scott, so I'll just say the B&W works well for those of us who are "color challenged." ;)
-Eric
-
While I like the drama of the b/w, though in agreement with Slobodan perhaps a little too much, the subtlety in some of the colors makes for what I think is a superb image. Is it my astigmatism or is it leaning right slightly?
-
Thanks for the positive comments. I agree, the B&W version needs some more work to the sky - it clearly does overpower the standing stone.
-
For once, I slightly prefer the color version (for the reason mentioned by Slobodan) but both are first-class.
Well done.
-
I like them both because they give me a very different feeling: the black&white gives the feeling of threath and impending doom while the color gives me a feeling of peaceful contemplation.