Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Landscape & Nature Photography => Topic started by: HSakols on January 02, 2016, 01:07:39 pm
-
Hi,
I notice on my last post that the images linked directly to flicker are better than the ones imbedded in my post. Why is this?
Hugh
-
Hi,
I notice on my last post that the images linked directly to flicker are better than the ones imbedded in my post. Why is this?
Hugh
I have had other posters mention that it appeared that flickr had over sharpened images I had stored there.
Apparently they do sharpen the reduced sizes. That seems a bit presumptuous to my way of thinking, given that any changes to an image should be the images owner's choice.
-
Would be nice to illustrate it. It is pretty easy to do so. Just use the same image, with the same dimensions, and post it twice in the same post: once from Flickr, the other attached.
-
Would be nice to illustrate it. It is pretty easy to do so. Just use the same image, with the same dimensions, and post it twice in the same post: once from Flickr, the other attached.
I went ahead and attached 3 of them. I guess there isn't much of a difference.
Hugh
-
No the attached image of the oak trees is a better rendering.
-
I thought Flickr applied its own sharpening to images?