Luminous Landscape Forum

Equipment & Techniques => Landscape & Nature Photography => Topic started by: maddogmurph on July 23, 2015, 04:00:00 pm

Title: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: maddogmurph on July 23, 2015, 04:00:00 pm
So I'm having trouble deciding whether full size, or 10x5 crop, or 15x5 crop suits this photo best.  Opinions/feedback?
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: KMRennie on July 23, 2015, 04:08:33 pm
10 by 5 for me.
Ken
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: spidermike on July 23, 2015, 04:08:42 pm
I prefer the proportions of #2 but in #3 I like the way the hint of darker sky at the top emphasises the 'banding' in the sky to match the receding hills.
Overall #3
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: mbaginy on July 23, 2015, 04:08:50 pm
Difficult choice, but I believe I prefer the uncropped image.  I was about to vote for the third image, but found the bottom needs darkening a tad.  It could be, that the darker upper and lower portions of the uncropped image provides more depth overall, hence my preference.

Nice photo for sure!
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on July 23, 2015, 05:32:08 pm
All three work fine. My preference would be for shots that are more "grounded," so #3 and #1, in that order.
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: louoates on July 23, 2015, 10:12:26 pm
15x5 for me. This crop makes the tree line foreground more important as it reflects the shape of the hills behind. I find this crop helps draw my attention to the serrated tree tops as well. I don't find the wide swath of sky that interesting and it detracts from the nice shapes below.
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: tom b on July 24, 2015, 12:15:22 am
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yisJ9n58xfo/VbG1iu62-xI/AAAAAAAAACk/OnSdgCaTrYE/s1600/st-helens.jpg).

Four things:

I think Slobodan's preference for the foreground is correct.

There is too much light space above the horizon, if you can create a mask and compress the sky you will get a more dramatic image.

The sky seems to have too much magenta in it  I'm not too sure what palette I would use for the sky but cooler seems better to my eye.

The rendering of the image should be your major focus.

This is just a quick and dirty rendering of your low res image on my 11" MacBook Air. Good luck.

Cheers,
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: mbaginy on July 24, 2015, 03:16:08 am
This is just a quick and dirty rendering of your low res image on my 11" MacBook Air. Good luck.
I like your rendition, Tom!
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on July 24, 2015, 03:40:09 am
I think #2 works best. I find the colour of the upper part of the sky odd.

Jeremy
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: Paulo Bizarro on July 24, 2015, 03:42:38 am
#3 for me.
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: thierrylegros396 on July 24, 2015, 05:39:57 am
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yisJ9n58xfo/VbG1iu62-xI/AAAAAAAAACk/OnSdgCaTrYE/s1600/st-helens.jpg).

There is too much light space above the horizon, if you can create a mask and compress the sky you will get a more dramatic image.


How do you compress the sky?

Have A Nice Day.

Thierry
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: tom b on July 24, 2015, 05:52:16 am
How do you compress the sky?

Have A Nice Day.

Thierry

Using Photoshop, Edit/transform.

Cheers,
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: MattBurt on July 24, 2015, 12:05:14 pm
I would take the third one and crop out the top half of the sky so the sky ends up being about 1/3 of the frame.
I also agree the sky is a little too purple but it's a nice image.
Title: Re: Mt. Saint Helen Haze
Post by: polaris-14 on July 24, 2015, 01:24:17 pm
I like the purple sky, and tom_b has a really nice rendition of the image.