Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: New Nikon format  (Read 9928 times)

DaveL

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 159
    • http://
New Nikon format
« Reply #20 on: July 28, 2010, 10:12:37 am »

Quote from: alanscape
Did you not like the Sony R1? I have had two. I still love it, with the rear element 2mm from the sensor...distortion? What distortion!

It always felt like my old Mamiya 645 pro. in use. I just tried a NEX-5 today... the only problem with it was that I hated it... it felt like a mobile phone stuck on a mid range zoom, great if you're addicted
to button pushes though.

I regret that I didn't buy an R1. At that point I was still trying to simplify my life. The focal length of the 828 lens matched my shooting needs.
We were in California and I had problems with birds in flight photos with the 828. Came home and bought a D80 to use lenses that I had stored for some time, and an 18-200VR that I bought (attempt to simplify my life). Recently the D80 morphed into a D300S, and I'm much happier with that choice. However, once again, I've made my life more complicated.
History---bought an F2 when they were first announced. F3 same story; Leica systems (M3; M4P) too.

I still have my 828. I wonder at the Panys out there, but Canadian pricing seems strangely expensive.

DaveL
Logged

alanscape

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 56
New Nikon format
« Reply #21 on: July 29, 2010, 07:56:31 am »

Quote from: dlynch
I regret that I didn't buy an R1. At that point I was still trying to simplify my life. The focal length of the 828 lens matched my shooting needs.
We were in California and I had problems with birds in flight photos with the 828. Came home and bought a D80 to use lenses that I had stored for some time, and an 18-200VR that I bought (attempt to simplify my life). Recently the D80 morphed into a D300S, and I'm much happier with that choice. However, once again, I've made my life more complicated.
History---bought an F2 when they were first announced. F3 same story; Leica systems (M3; M4P) too.

I still have my 828. I wonder at the Panys out there, but Canadian pricing seems strangely expensive.

DaveL

The R1 was a 'failure' (as a money spinner for Sony) but now they're available at a quarter of their launch prices and are real value for money.
Like you, I bought Nikon gear...D5000 + 16-85mm and a D90 + 70-300mm VR and discovered the R1 vs. the  D5000 + 16-85 is a close run thing. I did consider the Panasonic G1 but found the front
control wheel too easy to move accidentally, now the G2's got it in a different position but still, lens availability's never going to be on a par with Nikon.

My history mirrors yours with the addition of Hasselblad, Linhof, Mamiya and Sinar.

Yes, Canadian pricing does seem strange... is it the tax system?

P.S. Sorry for digressing from the original post somewhat!
Logged

schrodingerscat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 374
New Nikon format
« Reply #22 on: July 30, 2010, 10:45:17 pm »

Quote from: alanscape
Did you not like the Sony R1? I have had two. I still love it, with the rear element 2mm from the sensor...distortion? What distortion!

It always felt like my old Mamiya 645 pro. in use. I just tried a NEX-5 today... the only problem with it was that I hated it... it felt like a mobile phone stuck on a mid range zoom, great if you're addicted
to button pushes though.

I also had a brace of R1s. It's unfortunate that Sony decided to abandon the project to concentrate on DSLRs after acquiring Minolta. It handled well, produced excellent images, and you could put the histogram in the EVF. With the ability to work exposure compensation with your thumb, you could dial the exposure in on the fly. And then there was that brilliant fast lens...

Who knows what it would have become if they had continued development with constantly improving technologies.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up