Some posters were helpful and some were patronising there's a difference. Anyway you're the Mr Angry of LL and I have no desire to steal your position.
Angry? LOL, how ironic is that. In your own anger, you have ignored the same basic good advice 3x now. And that is, rather than come at the newspaper "angry" and as an enemy, come at them as a "friend" who's aware of the transgression, and who merely asks for a link back to your site. Do you not think their greater traffic might not be of ultimate benefit to you?
Or, as another mentioned, simply let them know
you know how long they've been using your images, and politely send a statement for the compensation for your services. The point is, if you come at them nice, it might actually be prove to be of great benefit for you. If you come at them (ahem) angry, at best they will just take the photos down and you get nothing.
I actually didn't come here angry in the least; I came here poking fun and having a laugh. I forgot you were so sensitive
Obviously you cannot live without me, as now your daft [your favourite word] thread on 'photography' has been closed you come here to contibute nothing and simply be bitchy.
LOL, this is the first time I have ever initiated a dialogue with you. The last 40+ times we have conversed, you have been the one to initiate
And I actually did contribute something ... a fine parallel highlighting the "turn lemons-into-lemonade" approach that has thrice-now been recommended to you over your "declare war" approach. Unfortunately it is
you who are still too bitchy to get it
In all honestly, JJJ, I wish you good luck in your efforts.
Jack
.