Based on the NYS project costs, it would cost $8 trillion dollars to replace the electric production in the US with wind assuming it was possible to operate with wind 100%. Of course, you can't Nor does the sun shine for solar. You still need to operate fossil fuel plants because wind doesn;t blow all the time. So you don't save anything.
Alan, that's nonsense, you're creating a strawman. You
do save by having to burn less fossil fuel (and produce less CO2 emission) with free wind and sun. These systems are
complementary, and will not
totally replace Fossil fuel utility plants.
Look at Germany. 40% of its electric are from renewables. Yet, their costs are 2 1/2 times Americas per KWH.
Are you serious? Since when does the cost in the USA reflect the true cost of energy? Add the cost to society from increased droughts, flooding, Hurricanes, diseases, etc., and you'll get a more realistic comparison.
Also, their CO2 production has hardly changed in ten years. So what have they accomplished? Nothing.
That's not
due to renewable enery. If Germany hadn't added renewables to the mix, then their emissions would have skyrocketed. They do need to scale down the coal-generated energy production, and they are aware of that because they've committed to doing that in the light of the Paris agreements.
You are still searching for arguments for inaction. Time has run out for such games.
Soon there will be Carbon taxing on international trade, and the laggards will pay dearly.
Cheers,
Bart