Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: exposure vs color/tonality with digital cameras  (Read 9172 times)

jani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1624
    • Øyet
exposure vs color/tonality with digital cameras
« Reply #20 on: November 07, 2008, 02:01:25 pm »

Quote from: Panopeeper
Another, cheaper way is to adjust the frames for example in ACR not with "exposure" adjustment but with fill light, recovery and/or brightness. You can match the sky (more or less) this way, and ignore for example a landscape, for it is not as sensitive to differences as the sky. (Note: a water surface is almost as sensitive as the sky). However, now the colors of the frames will go apart; only the grey remains grey.
Unless these controls have improved significantly from the version of ACR used in Lightroom 1.4 to Lightroom 2, then they must be used with extreme care!

The highlight recovery tool can introduce severe artifacts in brightly lit areas that aren't over-exposed, while fill light can introduce halos around edges in mid-tones.

Adjusting the curve directly by setting a different highlight delimiter and then pulling the curve or slider down may work just as well, depending on the image, of course.
Logged
Jan

joofa

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 544
exposure vs color/tonality with digital cameras
« Reply #21 on: November 07, 2008, 03:29:48 pm »

Quote from: GLuijk
That is clear, the question is why the 2 extra stops didn't mean an improvement in the basic bands of this banding. I would expect 4 times more bands in the second shot meaning softer transitions.

Image correlation structure between neighboring pixels remains (more or less) intact after adding 2 extra stops, quantization level is still constant, hence, little changes.
Logged
Joofa
http://www.djjoofa.com
Download Photoshop and After Effects plugins
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up