Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Landscape & Nature Photography => Topic started by: Dave Pluimer on September 26, 2014, 10:08:49 pm
-
A warmer process (~4100K) and a bit more attention in the dodge and burn areas.
Canon 6D, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L - 15s, ISO 6400
Any thoughts on the warmer WB vs the typical cool temps are very welcome.
-
Looks amazing as is Dave, Not sure if that is noise or the endless stars in the light areas of the water, that would
be my only nit.
Dwayne Oakes
-
Not sure if that is noise or the endless stars in the light areas of the water,
Dwayne Oakes
Thanks. Those are stars.
-
Nice shot. I actually tend to prefer milky way shots to be a little warmer than what is typically presented. Yours is very warm, which gives it a completely different feel. I don't know if it is necessarily good or bad, just different.
I would consider desaturating some of the blues out of some of the stars though, and I would probably prefer it if the reflected stars were cloned out... it looks a little messy to me as you can only see a few.
-
Hi Dave,
This photo is all about the colors - black gold, and magenta make for a wonderful combination.
My opinion is to chop the off the bottom 1/2 of water, (about 1/8 of the bottom photo) to make it less
bottom heavy. I think it is being kept there unnecessarily.
You're only getting about 4 extra star reflections, not enough IMO to sacrifice overall composition.
Great photo otherwise.
-
Hi Dave
I would be happy to have produced either but I prefer the cooler version.
Ken
-
I go with the cooler version as well. The warm setting tends to "muddy" the foreground a bit too much for my liking.