Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Medium Format / Film / Digital Backs – and Large Sensor Photography => Topic started by: Mike Sellers on October 10, 2011, 10:03:05 pm
-
What would cause a vertical line on the image? Would it be expensive to fix?
Mike
-
Did you happen to buy one recently on ebay? A friend of mine bought recently one and returned it due to the defective row of pixels.
-
If the whole line is dead you can either replace the sensor or you can maybe have the pixels remapped by Sinar but then you end up with a "step" in the image.
-
It is on ebay now. A new sensor would be expensive. Guess I will forget it.
-
Ah, so you're also watching that one on ebay with the bad column. Tempting at the €2.6k price, isn't it?
I'd certainly consider it for scientific shooting, where you can convert the channels to FITS format, and either interpolate, or shift-and-add with a BPM, to work around the bad column issue.
But for regular photography, I dunno. The corrective workflow might be a PITA. I'm not aware of RAW converters which can automatically handle that sort of problem; maybe RawTherapee can, since it's particularly good on properly calibrating images.
Ray
-
I have seen this with various HB backs. It is in most cases a column error and can be fixed in most cases. I have had it with my CF39. Normally fixing this is not extremely expensive, in the 500USD range. If you are unlucky, as I was, it means a broken control board. That one cost me 3K USD.
After fixing it, you will not see a 'step' in your image. It is not visible.
-
I contacted Sinar and was told that the back won`t work on my Contax 645 anyway. Here is what they said "Unfortunately it is not possible to mount Sinarback eSprit65LV on Contax 645. eSprit65LV supports Sinar Hy6, Mamiya 645AFD, Hasselblad H and Hasselblad V.
I took a look at the offer in ebay and I guess, that the owner of this digital back refers to an effect, that might be visible.
This effect can be removed by using Sinar eXposure for downlaoding the images."
-
from my experience this would tend to the £2k+ cost to fix
you could maybe mask it by taking a lens reference before every shot
ok on a repro stand for digitisation at a stretch maybe but very doubtful for the active mobile applications this cameraback was designed for
edwin