Greetings,After all these years of printing and running labs
I am debating whether to buy a 24" Canon or Epson Large format printer for Fine Art printing. My Artwork (https://www.rajneshdomalpalli.com/painting) is in Adobe RGB 1998.
Here, we have a choice between the Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-521 (https://in.canon/en/business/imageprograf-pro-521/product?category=printing&subCategory=large-format-printers) and the Epson SureColor SC-P7530 (https://www.epson.co.in/For-Work/Printers/Large-Format/Epson-SureColor-SC-P7530-Photo-Graphic-Production-Printer/p/C11CH12403)
I'll be running tests on different paper types, Hahnemuhle, Epson, Canon, and Ilford - perhaps Baryta Silk/ Satin and Metallic Equivalents (not sure yet).
I have two questions:
- Are there good comparisons between the Color Gamuts (both 2D and 3D) of the Epson and Canons?
- Any recommendations for the paper companies listed above. Canson is not available here.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Regards,
Rajnesh Domalpalli (https://www.rajneshdomalpalli.com)
After all these years of printing and running labs
My conclusion is don't just compare the color gamut when you want to buy a new printer.
I had a HP Z3200 which has the smallest gamut compare to the rest of my printers, 8300 and 7900 back in the time.
But the Z3200 makes the most beautiful print.
Another BUT, my workhorse was the 8300, mostly because the ease of use and the speed of it.
I have 6 epsons sitting in my lab now, including the P20000. to be honest, if time can goes back, i would pay a bit more to buy a canon Pro6100 (Pro561)
back to your question, I think the epson has a slightly larger gamut compare to the canon
that's it. :D
aaron
I can't recommend papers, it is totally subjective. Just pick two of the same papers ideally of which you locate a profile (hopefully from the same source).
Number of inks per se mean little. The profiles will tell us more.
| Canon_iPF_Pro-2100 (12 Color) | Hahnemuehle_FA_Baryta_Satin | ICC_Profile (https://www.dropbox.com/s/e6640x0dfwm9yxy/icc_profile_Hahnemuehle_FA_Baryta_Satin_Canon_iPF_Pro-2100.zip?dl=0) |
| Epson_SC-900 (10 Color) | Hahnemuehle_FA_Baryta_Satin | ICC_Profile (https://www.dropbox.com/s/lnhej792wzkc3zw/icc_profile_Hahnemuehle_FA_Baryta_Satin_Epson_SC-P900.zip?dl=0) |
| Canon_iPF_Pro-2100 (12 Color) | Ilford_Baryta_Gold_Fiber_Silk | ICC Profile (https://www.dropbox.com/s/jqso2ws7h9lcnj6/icc_profile_Ilford_Gold_Fiber_Silk_Canon_iPF_Pro-2100.zip?dl=0) |
| Epson_SC-900 (10 Color) | Ilford_Baryta_Gold_Fiber_Silk | ICC Profile (https://www.dropbox.com/s/jreft58mc6yf5aw/icc_profile_Ilford_Baryta_Gold_Fiber_Silk_Epson_SC-900.icc?dl=0) |
Thank you for your replies, aaronchan, arobinson7557, deanwork and digitaldog.
Digitaldog, I would love to take you up on your offer. Give me a few days to collect the materials.
I'm new to this world of printing, and excited to be part of this community.
My current expectation is to buy a 12 color ink 24" printer for my Digital Paintings (https://www.rajneshdomalpalli.com/painting).
But I've toyed with the idea of a 17" Epson P900+roll feeder too.
I have two questions:
- I'm leaning on printing on Hahnemulle's Fineart Baryta Satin, but Ilford's Gold fiber Silk is priced 30% cheaper here. For bright, saturated artwork, great tonal range and rich blacks, could you please recommend a few choices of paper.
- Finally, the P900 is a 10 color ink system, and I was wondering whether there was any good comparison data between this 10 ink system and a 12 ink system. Basically, how much more would I get in a print, going from 10 to 12 inks?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Best,
Rajnesh
Upload the profiles to something like Dropbox and I will look them over.
Now with the Fiber paper, a different story, starting with Gamut Volume then 3D gamut map where Epson has a wider gamut in greens and a tad in yellows:
Now with the Fiber paper, a different story, starting with Gamut Volume then 3D gamut map where Epson has a wider gamut in greens and a tad in yellows:
The Epson reds and yellows are significantly more permanent than the Lucia Pro2 inkset.That's why I've stuck with my 8300 and 6400. If Canon ever comes out with an improved inkset I might upgrade.
And Canon removed their green ink to put in a poorly designed gloss enhancer. The previous Lucia inkset ( IpF 8300-8400 ) was not only a lot more stable in terms of fade resistance but had much better green gamut and looked just as smooth or smoother on fiber gloss media.
I’ve heard rumors about a new Canon printer coming soon. If they would go back to their previous inkset I’d seriously consider it.
John
aaronchan,
I would have thought, for B&W work (I took a look at your link), the P20000 would sorta be the Holly Grail. So I gotta ask, What has soured you on the P20000 to make you crave an IPF6100, [other than the Grass being Greener on the other side of the Fence)
I'm guessing that the P20000 has be a little bit of a pain in the #ss (like most Epsons with the Clogging and such)
Do tell....
As to the original question, I would also factor in weather you main media is Matte (Fine Art Papers/Canvas) or Coated Photo Papers