Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Jeremy Roussak on February 28, 2019, 02:57:56 pm
-
.
Jeremy
-
Two.
If you had in mind the bottom one, its feet are kinda awkwardly cut off. If you can't extend the image to include the feet, cloning the whole bird out wouldn't hurt the idea of "there is always one..." That one being the middle bird.
-
I think I agree with SLobodan's suggestion.
In any case, this is worthy of Stamper.
-
I was referring to the middle bird. I'll see if I can clone out the one on the ground, to remove possible confusion.
I'm flattered by the comparison to Stamper!
Jeremy
-
+1 to whatever has been mentioned already.
I also think the image then becomes very much about graphics and recognisable shapes which suggests a gritty b&w conversion perhaps?
-
Clearer in intent?
Jeremy
-
Clearer in intent?
Jeremy
Yes!
-
Yes!
+1.
-
Yup. ;D
-
:) Good catch Jeremy!!
-
I prefer the lone bird in the first photo.
Kind of beauty spot :)
Symmetry is not everything IMHO
-
I agree with Rab. You've gotta go back and re-shoot that, Jeremy, making sure the rest of the single bird's feet are in the frame.
-
I agree with Rab. You've gotta go back and re-shoot that, Jeremy, making sure the rest of the single bird's feet are in the frame.
who needs legs for flying? ;)
-
I prefer the lone bird in the first photo...
There is always one...
-
There is always one...
I'm sure that I'm not the only one here that prefers beauty over architecture, Slobodan ;D
-
I'm sure that I'm not the only one here that prefers beauty over architecture, Slobodan ;D
;D
I would bring popcorn but I'm working tonight
-
I agree with Rab. You've gotta go back and re-shoot that, Jeremy, making sure the rest of the single bird's feet are in the frame.
Oh, there's plenty of image at the bottom. I've cropped it out because it's horribly blurred, and there's not much I can do about that.
Jeremy