Luminous Landscape Forum
Raw & Post Processing, Printing => Adobe Lightroom Q&A => Topic started by: Rand47 on October 19, 2017, 08:45:51 pm
-
I don’t want to sound negative. I love LULA, and deeply appreciate Kevin and Chris’ efforts. But there was a time when LULA would have been “all over” the LR Classic release, the differences between the the CC Cloud version and the Classic version, the new tools and what they do, etc.
Thankfully there are astute members here that are discussing these things ... but . . . I miss the “inside info and insight” of days gone by.
Not grumpy... just wistful.
Rand
-
We heard about this at the same time you did. No insider info. Not even for those in the know. I was prepping an article then the forum lit up. Hard to be on top of news if the news isn't shared by Adobe. Not even a press release. I'll be with Jeff Schewe in a week and we'll do a sit-down discussion on video about this and share it. We will also be looking into doing a ground-up tutorial. As it is now I will most likely have a rant on this topic. Frankly the more I try to understand things on this release the more I get confused. Lots of alternatives and a lot of people looking from what I have heard. MacPhun hit the airwaves today with a future announcement. Phase One and Capture One are a worthy alternative. I was in Copenhagen a few weeks ago doing videos on the new back and camera features and I know there are a lot of people there working on Capture One.
If Adobe would have shared with us we would have shared with you. There are some things coming soon that we are on top of.
-
We heard about this at the same time you did. No insider info. Not even for those in the know. I was prepping an article then the forum lit up. Hard to be on top of news if the news isn't shared by Adobe. Not even a press release. I'll be with Jeff Schewe in a week and we'll do a sit-down discussion on video about this and share it. We will also be looking into doing a ground-up tutorial. As it is now I will most likely have a rant on this topic. Frankly the more I try to understand things on this release the more I get confused. Lots of alternatives and a lot of people looking from what I have heard. MacPhun hit the airwaves today with a future announcement. Phase One and Capture One are a worthy alternative. I was in Copenhagen a few weeks ago doing videos on the new back and camera features and I know there are a lot of people there working on Capture One.
If Adobe would have shared with us we would have shared with you. There are some things coming soon that we are on top of.
Kevin,
WOW... Adobe’s really acting strange if they don’t recognize LULA as “someone” who should be in the know on stuff like this. I agree with you... I’m scratching my head. I withdraw my “wistfulness” in light of you guys being blind-sided by Adobe on this one... This isn’t an encouraging sign, IMO, re the trustworthiness, direction, and dedication to “photographers” of Adobe moving forward.
On a different, but related in my mind, subject - have you tried X-Transformer plug-in for your RAF Fuji files? I thought it was hype until I tried it. If an individual can come up with this processing for the X-Trans files on his own, what the heck has Adobe been doing? LR is “better than it was” re RAF, but the X-Transforer files are clearly superior.
Anyway, look forward to your rant!
Thanks,
Rand
-
Rand,
For me C1 has been really good at handling the Fuji X files. There are a number of engineers at Phase One who have Fuji cameras and thus they work hard to make the software work for them and us. The newest version of C1 handles masking for Fuji files. This feature makes working with Fuji files real strong. You can auto mask and do layered adjustments. I have also come up with a few C1 sharpening settings that work well the files too. I have tried the others RAW processors but I need the whole system for the kins of work I do and C1 is the go to app I use.
I also use Lightroom a lot too for Leica files and files not supported in Capture One so I am pretty good with LR too. As I said I am still trying to wrap my head around having 2 versions of LR on my computer. I have loaded the mobile apps on my ipads and it does work. Just seems to be a lot of limitations compared to the classic version. Frankly, as much as I depend on the cloud I will have a hard time using it for my images. For many places landscape shooters photograph, there is usually not good internet connections. And, we won't even discuss using cellular on an international plan to upload to the cloud.
Whoops, started to get on my soapbox a bit.
-
Look forward to seeing your discussion with Jeff Schewe, been a long time since we last heard his thoughts on ... well anything in fact.
Also amazed that you were out of Adobe's loop as a few other websites had quite detailed information online very quickly so they surely must have had something already prepared ?
-
I also use Lightroom a lot too for Leica files and files not supported in Capture One so I am pretty good with LR too.
I'm a Nikon/Olympus/Fuji user who's a newish convert to CaptureOne. I'm 95% committed to shutting down Lightroom. I'm liking how CO works with my files. But the last 5% has to do with DAM.
Anyways, if you have time, I'd appreciate your comparison between the two.
-
Typically what happens with other camera and software companies the press and sites like ours are provided press releases with information as well as links to try the software early. As expected we are under embargo and sometimes some very tight NDAs. This gives us a chance to prep anything we may want to publish. It's not uncommon too to be invited to a press event where you can touch and feel the products. There was no such thing coming from Adobe to us. Not sure it went to others either. Maybe they didn't really want to publicize the release. They certainly have caused a lot of confusion for many not to mention discussions like here on this forum.
On the day and time of the release, I was pinned under an MRI machine and out of the loop for a few hours. I get back to my car and look at the site and new info and the release was all over the place. Wow, I knew Adobe MAX was happening and I heard (rumors and chatter) that there was not a lot new with LL except some speed increases. Technicaly I suppose that was accurate. Yes, the new masking feature is nice but that's about it except for speed increases. Frankly, not a lot of big news and the speed increase was way overdue. The news was the cloud base approach to LR and how the Legacy LR (if I can call it that) would be handled.
I am still trying out the new cloud-based service. Not that impressed. It crashed twice on the MAC and on the iPad there isn't even a histogram I could find. It's not that fast. I am now importing all the images I shot with Leicas over the last month (DNGS) onto the cloud. I'll try editing both on MAC and iPad. But where's my histogram?
I travel to many remote places like many of you do and fight internet connections at hotels and elsewhere on a continual basis. As a result, I most likely won't put a lot of weight into loading my images to the cloud. hat feature I think will be saved for the Instagram crowd.
There are a number of alternatives out there if one is frustrated with Adobe. I really want to like LR but I am closely watching what some of these newer companies are doing. MacPhun was quick to the draw releasing news about their upcoming product and it sounds exciting. They have proven themselves with Luminar and their HDR programs. Plus they are constantly updating them. They have replaced the NIK plugins for the most part for me. Pixelmator has an exciting new program about to be released which looks like it will be a Photoshop replacement. And, as many of you know Affinity has a nice program out too. Plus, Phase One and Capture One has a program many Pros and enthusiasts are using more and more. It offers a new processing engine with almost every release and some really powerful tools in a customizable interface. It's super fast. It it is weak on the printing side, but for me, I output as a tiff and take it over to Imageprint as I have explained in previous articles.
I pay Adobe over 53.00 a month for the whole suite of apps. I can only use them on two machines. I have yet to find a way to add seats but even if I could I am sure it would come at a cost. I am constantly having to sign off of a machine and log in on another to use the programs.
Just some thoughts for now. After all the good topics in the forum I decided to pass on publsihing anything. Thanks Adobe for the heads up (not).
-
Where's the histogram? Try printing, Kevin.... ;)
-
John, Let's add that to the list unless it is cleverly hidden. Snapseed seems to have more to offer than LR Mobile. I hate to be negative but without a histogram how could I even begin to edit an image. No levels, no printing. I'll spend some more time on the iPad version to make sure I am not missing anything. I will spend some time later on the cloud-based LR on my mac but so far the iPad version is not impressing me.
-
John, Let's add that to the list unless it is cleverly hidden. Snapseed seems to have more to offer than LR Mobile. I hate to be negative but without a histogram how could I even begin to edit an image. No levels, no printing. I'll spend some more time on the iPad version to make sure I am not missing anything. I will spend some time later on the cloud-based LR on my mac but so far the iPad version is not impressing me.
I like John's comment in one of the other threads: Think of LRCC as LR Mobile for your Mac/PC. Given the current feature list, that seems pretty accurate.
Dave
-
Though David rightly mentions my comparison with LRM, in this thread I was only talking about LRCC, the new PC/Mac app, Kevin. Just so no-one's confused, including me....
I would describe LRCC as being both "dumbed-down" and "feature-incomplete". Some features fall into the first category, like the keywording and much of the metadata side where there is the bare minimum - not even colour labels. I just don't believe these features will be any less dumbed-down in the future. On the "feature-incomplete" side things will probably come, and I would suggest that includes printing, batch editing, and anything from Adobe Camera Raw like histogram, tone curves, split toning etc. Adobe never seems happier than when it's wrapping another UI around ACR.....
-
Kevin,
When I see the number of tread opened recently that complain about the disappearance of the perpetual license, I think that a lot of people still want to have that kind of product.
OK, C1 can import LR catalogs, but not the settings you've made.
More, what about the useful camera calibration?!
I'm very deceived, and it's because of money problems.
Hope you'll have some constructive conversation with Adobe crew soon.
Have a Nice Day.
Thierry
-
When I see the number of tread opened recently that complain about the disappearance of the perpetual license, I think that a lot of people still want to have that kind of product.
OK, C1 can import LR catalogs, but not the settings you've made.
Yep, I certainly can't be the only one that looked at perpetual as a comfort for if I ever decide to stop subscription, or far more likely stop being able to afford it. And I'm in no way interested in the mere stoppage of develop and map modules - or even import for that matter. It was a comfort to know I'm not locked in. I just don't think I'm the only one in that boat. A boat of serious amateur/hobbyists (and likely some professionals, too).
Capture one is getting there, although the speed of the catalog is but one major stumbling block for me. There are many others for me, but...
-
the healing brush in PS CC is really slow now!
LR CC classic is also slow now with the brush and moving files to a catolouge
Is anyone having the same issues if not do I have to Kick my MB pro to get it to move faster?
Thanks
-
Where's the histogram? Try printing, Kevin.... ;)
Histogram can be switched on by selecting the 3 little dots at top right and turning on in the pop up that appears.
Dave
-
the healing brush in PS CC is really slow now!
LR CC classic is also slow now with the brush and moving files to a catolouge
Is anyone having the same issues if not do I have to Kick my MB pro to get it to move faster?
I haven't checked PS as I don't really use it.. But LR Classic (LR-c) is super slow on my machine. Part of that may due to an [apparently] ongoing known issue with AMD and GPU acceleration that was introduced at 2015.10.1, which I needed to revert back to 2015.10 in order to keep using it here (rather significant speedup on my laptop for the areas it was supposed to speedup). I couldn't find release notes for LR-c, but it's obviously still not fixed. (Win10 AMD A8-3500M APU, w/HD6620G graphics onboard)
However, having said that, LR-c is several order of magnitude slower than 2015.10.1 - 2015.12, with all having the disabled GPU acceleration. Having done a tad more tests on an HDR using smart preview proxy, not zoomed in - an example is a change done with 2105.12 that may have taken about 3 or so seconds, now takes about 30 seconds on the same image. Unfortunately I had the installer remove 2015.10, but obviously at this speed, LR-c is for all intents and purposes useless. I may have to finally break down and reinstall 2015.10 again at this rate, but I'm kinda into other things for the time being. It's really unfortunate because I really wanted to test more of the worthwhile range masks that finally made it into LR - it's akin to being able to brush out grads/rads with 2015.x, but should be FAR better if I could test it more.
-
Thanks, Dave, cleverly hidden. Not a very good histogram though. But at least I can see clipping now.
-
Am I getting terminally confused, or has „Lightroom Mobile“ now morphed into „Adobe Lightroom CC“ for iPad? This seems to have happened when I updated LRM from the App Store. And LRM certainly had a histogram, which seems to have vanished.
Actually I don‘t really care personally, I don’t use LRM to retouch but rather to edit and refine collections away from the computer. I find that to be a really nice feature, but it relies on the now old sync mechanism. Obviously it would be even better if LRM had decent Library functions, but that sure isn’t going to happen now.
The other thing that puzzles me about ”Adobe Lightroom CC“ for iPad is that it now announces that I am using 0 out of 20Gb ... so where are my sync’d Smart Previews stored?
Adobe must have bought Consultants in to manage make it this complicated and confusing...
-
We heard about this at the same time you did. No insider info.
I guess that says it all. Other sites were in, LuLa was/is not.
-
I guess that says it all. Other sites were in, LuLa was/is not.
It says little. Some sites were in, some were not, and it may be that Kevin's old links to PhaseOne didn't help Lula. Also, Adobe experienced lots of leaks this time - some accidental, some from Adobe's own support, others from beta testers. All that may have made them reluctant to open up any more.
-
It says little. Some sites were in, some were not, and it may be that Kevin's old links to PhaseOne didn't help Lula. Also, Adobe experienced lots of leaks this time - some accidental, some from Adobe's own support, others from beta testers. All that may have made them reluctant to open up any more.
You said it. The C1 bias on this site is palpable. :)
-
I miss the “inside info and insight” of days gone by.
Not grumpy... just wistful.
Well, I guess what you miss is the 18-24 month gestation period and the violent birth of a new major upgrade of software...but that's not the way software is developed these days...
While Kevin isn't on the inside of Adobe and didn't know the details of what was going to be announced at Adobe MAX...some of us were. Personally, I didn't think there was too much to write home about otherwise i would have. The end of perpetual licenses for LR was pretty much telegraphed (regardless of the way Hogarty was misunderstood).
As far as Lightroom CC (the cloud based version) nothing much to see there...it's LR with missing features and not designed for the LuLa marketplace. The odds are nobody here would seriously consider NOT using the full Lightroom Classic in favor of Lightroom CC. Is there?
Now we come to Lightroom Classic...what's new to see here? Well, Range Mask is pretty cool. I have been testing that for a while and was responsible for also keeping the older Auto Mask so you can use both in combination. Oh, and yes, Auto Mask has been improved as well...less grainy noise and smoother results. So, combining Range and Auto Mask together is a big workflow improvement for local adjustments...but it's an incremental improvement as are all the other improvements in LR Classic
I really don't know what all the noise is all about...I did warn Kevin that stuff would be announced at Adobe MAX but I was on the road in the Badlands with spotty cell coverage. So, I didn't get a chance to tell him a lot.
As far as LuLa being out of the loop...not really, but neither Kevin nor Chris are currently beta testers...if Kevin would learn how to actually USE Lightroom, I could prolly get him on beta...I've offered but Kev is a C1 leaning sort of guy.
In terms of videos and/or tutorials, that's something Kevin and I are due to talk about in a couple of weeks...the timing of which is dependent upon some stuff I know about that I can't really tell Kevin (well, I can't tell him publicly) but I suspect he knows some of it because he was with Thomas no too long ago and Thomas tends to tell friends what he's doing :~)
So, I think what you are missing is the old days of drama leading up to a major new upgrade and all the attending problems of trying to learn how to use it...that time has passed and won't be coming back, sorry.
-
As far as Lightroom CC (the cloud based version) nothing much to see there...it's LR with missing features and not designed for the LuLa marketplace. The odds are nobody here would seriously consider NOT using the full Lightroom Classic in favor of Lightroom CC. Is there?
Now we come to Lightroom Classic...what's new to see here? Well, Range Mask is pretty cool. I have been testing that for a while and was responsible for also keeping the older Auto Mask so you can use both in combination... [this] is a big workflow improvement for local adjustments...
Agree with both of those statements. Range masking with Auto Mask is actually very neat. It's as near a substitute for luminosity-masking-layers as we're likely to get without layers (which I'm happy not to have BTW).
I can't find anything on the market right now that is as useable (speedy development of a bunch of images) or as refined as LR Classic for such a wide range of development processes... and over the past 12 months I've tried everything and bought two or three (as insurance should they improve: my strongest hopes are with either Luminar or Affinity ... but both are a long way back on the DAM/Print timeline).
Also — although I'm unlikely to use LR Web or CC — LR for iOS is more advanced and not a bad "first instance" processor that allows me to determine on the road what will be worth processing back on the desktop. I just wish I could use my development presets from LR Classic in LR for iOS. Then I'd be able to use the two of them more successfully in "serial".
Best, P
-
Thanks for the input Jeff. I'm sure we'll have some good chats on our trip. Yes, I was with Thomas and we talked about a lot of things. But, no I was not a beta tester of LR. But, yes I do use it (sometimes) more so lately. Always open for new instruction from Jeff (hope he is nicer to me than he was with Michael). So, I'll speak with Eric and the LR crew about being a beta tester in the future. Still, it would have been nice to have a press release even with an embargo like we get from so many others. Maybe next time.
I have tried the luminosity masking in AC and it is pretty cool. Works great on landscape images which is what I tested it on.
The Cloud version is nice and kind of fun to adjust images on an iPad but I'm not sure it is something I would really adopt. I certainly can see where the marketplace is for this product though. I'm sure Adobe will add to the features over time.
-
You said it. The C1 bias on this site is palpable. :)
I'm not sure Adobe care much, but wasn't Kevin employed by P1? My sense is that Michael was closer to Adobe, Kevin less so. That's just the way the cookie crumbles.
-
Thanks for the input Jeff. I'm sure we'll have some good chats on our trip. Yes, I was with Thomas and we talked about a lot of things. But, no I was not a beta tester of LR. But, yes I do use it (sometimes) more so lately. Always open for new instruction from Jeff (hope he is nicer to me than he was with Michael). So, I'll speak with Eric and the LR crew about being a beta tester in the future. Still, it would have been nice to have a press release even with an embargo like we get from so many others. Maybe next time.
I have tried the luminosity masking in AC and it is pretty cool. Works great on landscape images which is what I tested it on.
The Cloud version is nice and kind of fun to adjust images on an iPad but I'm not sure it is something I would really adopt. I certainly can see where the marketplace is for this product though. I'm sure Adobe will add to the features over time.
Maybe we can refer to this version as Lightroom Selfie CC and update the name as the features progress.
-
Well, I guess what you miss is the 18-24 month gestation period and the violent birth of a new major upgrade of software...but that's not the way software is developed these days...
While Kevin isn't on the inside of Adobe and didn't know the details of what was going to be announced at Adobe MAX...some of us were. Personally, I didn't think there was too much to write home about otherwise i would have. The end of perpetual licenses for LR was pretty much telegraphed (regardless of the way Hogarty was misunderstood).
As far as Lightroom CC (the cloud based version) nothing much to see there...it's LR with missing features and not designed for the LuLa marketplace. The odds are nobody here would seriously consider NOT using the full Lightroom Classic in favor of Lightroom CC. Is there?
Now we come to Lightroom Classic...what's new to see here? Well, Range Mask is pretty cool. I have been testing that for a while and was responsible for also keeping the older Auto Mask so you can use both in combination. Oh, and yes, Auto Mask has been improved as well...less grainy noise and smoother results. So, combining Range and Auto Mask together is a big workflow improvement for local adjustments...but it's an incremental improvement as are all the other improvements in LR Classic
I really don't know what all the noise is all about...I did warn Kevin that stuff would be announced at Adobe MAX but I was on the road in the Badlands with spotty cell coverage. So, I didn't get a chance to tell him a lot.
As far as LuLa being out of the loop...not really, but neither Kevin nor Chris are currently beta testers...if Kevin would learn how to actually USE Lightroom, I could prolly get him on beta...I've offered but Kev is a C1 leaning sort of guy.
In terms of videos and/or tutorials, that's something Kevin and I are due to talk about in a couple of weeks...the timing of which is dependent upon some stuff I know about that I can't really tell Kevin (well, I can't tell him publicly) but I suspect he knows some of it because he was with Thomas no too long ago and Thomas tends to tell friends what he's doing :~)
So, I think what you are missing is the old days of drama leading up to a major new upgrade and all the attending problems of trying to learn how to use it...that time has passed and won't be coming back, sorry.
Hey! Jeff...
THANKS! Your post is exactly the kind of insight and explanation I was talking about. LOL
But your points are well taken.
You are, the Man! (Ever consider your own Photography Web Site? “Swami Schewe’s Digital Nirvana”). ;D
Rand
-
...the timing of which is dependent upon some stuff I know about that I can't really tell Kevin (well, I can't tell him publicly) but I suspect he knows some of it because he was with Thomas no too long ago and Thomas tends to tell friends what he's doing :~)...
Could it be Deep Fill (https://www.dpreview.com/news/2758068086/adobe-s-project-deep-fill-is-an-incredible-ai-powered-content-aware-fill) already unveiled by DPReview?
-
Could it be Deep Fill (https://www.dpreview.com/news/2758068086/adobe-s-project-deep-fill-is-an-incredible-ai-powered-content-aware-fill) already unveiled by DPReview?
Nope but close...it does involve AI though.
-
Still, it would have been nice to have a press release even with an embargo like we get from so many others. Maybe next time.
Well, this is what I got at 11am on Oct 18th....this was the press release:
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Adobe Introduces New Lightroom CC Cloud Photography Service
Integrated Cloud-based Service Enables Easy Editing, Organizing, Storing, and Sharing of Photography From Anywhere
Today Adobe announced the all-new Adobe Photoshop Lightroom CC cloud-based photography service. Launched over a decade ago, Lightroom became the industry’s leading desktop application for editing and organizing photography. Now in an increasingly mobile-centric world, and with major improvements in smartphone cameras, Lightroom is transforming digital photography again. Built for professionals and enthusiasts, the new Lightroom CC fulfills the demands of today’s photographers for a more accessible, cloud-based photography service for editing, organizing, storing and sharing their photos from wherever they are.
Featuring a streamlined user interface, Lightroom CC enables powerful editing in full resolution across mobile, desktop, and the web. With Lightroom CC, photographers can make edits on one device and automatically synchronize their changes everywhere. Lightroom CC makes organizing photography collections easier with features like searchable keywords that are automatically applied without the hassle of tagging. And Lightroom CC makes it simple to share photos on social media.
Key Lightroom CC capabilities
The most powerful image editing technology: Built on the same imaging technology that powers Photoshop and Lightroom, Lightroom CC offers a new streamlined interface with easy-to-use sliders, presets, and quick adjustment tools.
Edit anywhere: Lightroom CC allows photographers to edit full-resolution photos anywhere – on mobile devices, desktop, or the web. Edits made on one device are automatically synced across devices for anywhere access.
Worry free back-up, cloud storage: Lightroom CC has scalable storage options for safe and secure back up of full resolution photos – including raw files.
Powered by Adobe Sensei: Adobe Sensei’s machine learning technology automatically applies searchable keywords to objects in photographs – making organization in Lightroom CC effortless.
Built-in sharing tools: Lightroom CC makes it easy to share photos directly via social media and to create custom Lightroom web galleries that can be shared via link. Photographers can also share their work through new Adobe Portfolio integration with Lightroom CC.
Updated award-winning mobile and web experiences:
Lightroom CC for mobile on iOS: Built-in search functionality powered by Adobe Sensei, keyword support, hierarchical album support, an enhanced iPad app layout, and iOS 11 files support.
Lightroom CC for mobile on Android:
Tablet support and a local adjustments brush, along with the same built-in search functionality, keyword support, and hierarchical album support as seen in the iOS app.
Lightroom CC for web: Ability to create and manage a public gallery page, and enhanced integration with Adobe Portfolio, which enables subscribers to easily import collections and publish their best shots to a customized Portfolio website in just a few clicks.
Updates to Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic CC
Previously known as Lightroom CC, major updates to Lightroom Classic CC include an enhanced Embedded Preview workflow that enables users to scroll through large sets of photos to select a subset of images significantly faster than before. Lightroom Classic CC also features new editing capabilities, including a new Color Range and Luminance Masking functionality that enables users to apply precise edits. As contrasted with the cloud-centric, anywhere workflows of Lightroom CC, the new Lightroom Classic CC continues to focus on a more traditional desktop-first workflow with local storage and file and folder control.
The all new Lightroom CC is available across three photography plans:
For photographers that want an all-in-one plan that offers the full benefits of the Lightroom CC service plus the transformative power of Photoshop, the Creative Cloud Photography plan with 1 TB includes Lightroom CC, Lightroom for mobile and web, Photoshop CC, Adobe Spark with premium features, Adobe Portfolio, and 1 TB of cloud storage ($19.99/month, but available at $14.99/month for the first year for existing Creative Cloud Photography customers)
Lightroom CC has also been added to the existing Creative Cloud Photography plan with an additional 20 GB of storage to help users get started on the new service. This plan remains at $9.99/month and includes Lightroom CC, Lightroom for mobile and web, Lightroom Classic, Photoshop CC, Adobe Spark with premium features, Adobe Portfolio, and 20 GB of cloud storage.
Creative Cloud All Apps members also have access to the new Lightroom CC service.
The all new Lightroom CC plan addresses the needs of photographers who want a cloud-based photography service for editing, organizing, storing and sharing their photos from wherever they are, and includes Lightroom CC, Lightroom for mobile and web, Adobe Spark with premium features, Adobe Portfolio, and 1 TB of cloud storage ($9.99/month)
For those who are truly mobile and don’t require a desktop photography solution, the Lightroom Mobile plan for iOS and Android is available with 100 GB ($4.99/month).
Links:
For more information on available plans, please visit Plans (https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/plans.html)
Photography Page (http://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/photography.html)
Learn more about Lightroom CC (http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop-lightroom.html)
Creative Cloud Photography plan FAQ (https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/faq/CCPp.html)
Lightroom CC FAQ (https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-cc/faq.html)
Blog Post (http://blogs.adobe.com/photoshop/2017/10/introducing-lightroom-cc-lightroom-classic-cc-and-more.html)
-
Nope but close...it does involve AI though.
Although I know you are probably under an NDA and you will not confirm it, after this comment my bet will go to Content-aware fill like in Photoshop...
http://dgpfotografia.com
-
Although I know you are probably under an NDA and you will not confirm it, after this comment my bet will go to Content-aware fill like in Photoshop...
http://dgpfotografia.com
Isn't that "Deep Fill"?
-
Isn't that "Deep Fill"?
Sorry, you’re right, deep fill is content-aware with AI... I was mistook it with this other for video https://m.dpreview.com/news/2908040206/demo-adobe-s-experimental-cloak-tech-is-like-content-aware-fill-for-video ... my bad...
http://dgpfotografia.com