Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: dawn  (Read 942 times)

lorenzettifoto

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 136
    • Andrea Lorenzetti photographer
dawn
« on: April 28, 2015, 09:24:54 am »

a dawn last Sunday on the Tuscan hills
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: dawn
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2015, 10:14:26 am »

While the sky is impressive, I find the foreground, and particularly the road, too bright.

Roman Racela

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 285
Re: dawn
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2015, 01:45:01 pm »

I agree with Slobodan. I love the exploding sky, but the foreground needs to match. This calls for a darker, more moody F/G. Just burn the road to make it dark and see how it looks. :)
Logged

maddogmurph

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1117
    • Maddog's Photography
Re: dawn
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2015, 05:42:37 pm »

Framing is perfect, color transitions are nice and smooth, overall feeling is nice, something's slightly amiss.  The grass for me looks over processed perhaps in the lower right.  Could be my crappy work monitor however, I'm sure it's looks splendid full size in raw.
Logged
Maddog Murph
www.depictionsofbeauty.com
Mostly here for constructive feedback.

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13794
Re: dawn
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2015, 04:50:43 am »

I agree with Slobodan. I love the exploding sky, but the foreground needs to match. This calls for a darker, more moody F/G. Just burn the road to make it dark and see how it looks. :)

I also agree. I was immediately struck by the too light foreground with the dark sky. It's an easy fix and the photo is well worth 30 seconds of PP.
Logged
Francois

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: dawn
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2015, 05:54:37 am »

Before I read the other posts my initial reaction was... where is the slight red cast that should have been seen on the foreground from the setting sun? I don't subscribe to the idea of an image being totally realistic but there has to be a degree of realism. The foreground doesn't match the setting sun in the sky.

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3296
Re: dawn
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2015, 09:50:54 am »

I agree that a camera would record the road as being dark. But IMO our eyes in the field see these kinds of foreground objects very clearly. I don't find the road too bright. And I really like the little bend in the distance.

lorenzettifoto

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 136
    • Andrea Lorenzetti photographer
Re: dawn
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2015, 11:34:00 am »

I lightened the color of the road because the raw to me seemed too dark, but in reality I see that you bothers. Never mind I can work the raw again, thank you very much for your comments
Logged

Rajan Parrikar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3950
    • Rajan Parrikar
Re: dawn
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2015, 11:55:36 am »

Love it!

jerryw

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 85
    • Jerry Weimar Photography
Re: dawn
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2015, 11:47:09 am »

I really like this composition - very well done.  Sometimes the best images are the simplest ones.

I read the comments re: the road being too light... I don't mind it the way it is, but would enjoy seeing a second post with less lightening, for comparison.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up