Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Intersection  (Read 958 times)

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Intersection
« on: March 31, 2015, 10:53:30 am »

This is the best I can do do with this shot knowing what I currently know; applying concept, composition and processing. I am uploading a jpg of the raw file I selected and a jpg of a wider view. I would appreciate anyone who would take the time to share how he/she would have approached this setting pre or post exposure. A specific question I would ask is would it have more appeal with a greater DOF (used f8)?
Thanks in advance, -t
Logged
One Day At A Time

brandtb

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 972
    • http://www.brandtbolding.com
Re: Intersection
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2015, 04:39:16 pm »

First is best version far and away...especially the drama of clouds in B/W... which is lost in the color. The last image wide has some really uninteresting stuff in frame...why would you want that in there as it just pulls the image down? Especially on the right...those trees pull everything out of balance. DOF question is nitpicking I think...how much more do you need? Do you want the uninteresting foreground in focus as well?...don't think so. I can't say the image is that great all things considered but the first version brings a decent focus, intensity, and compositional integrity... and to pore over a lot of potential work on it I don't know if that would be worth the time... /B
Logged
Brandt Bolding
www.brandtbolding.com

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Intersection
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2015, 05:08:47 pm »

I have to agree with Brandtb on all points.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

David Eckels

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3528
  • It's just a camera.
    • Website
Re: Intersection
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2015, 06:15:49 pm »

I have to agree with Brandtb on all points.
Me too. Dof is fine, IMHO, but otherwise, what brandtb says.

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2798
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: Intersection
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2015, 06:52:44 pm »

I agree with the others above - the first is the best.

Perhaps you could add just a little move grad filter to the road making the foreground slightly darker, but, to me, there is still something missing and I can't put my finger on it.

One idea might be to have the same shot but with the blur of a car heading towards the intersection (away from the viewer).
Logged
Terry McDonald - luxBorealis.com

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Intersection
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2015, 07:45:25 pm »

I agree with Terry. Something's missing. Practically every FSA photographer made a picture of a road leading off into the distance. There's one by Dorothea Lange that particularly sticks in my mind. The road's vanishing point was the point of focus and the point of interest in all of those pictures.This road doesn't lead off into the distance. It ends a hundred yards or so up that slight hill. There's really no point of focus in the picture. Technically, it's good. The clouds are great. But in the end it doesn't seem to say much.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

BobDavid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3307
Re: Intersection
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2015, 09:52:54 pm »

Maybe a tighter crop??
Logged

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Re: Intersection
« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2015, 11:13:35 pm »

Thanks everybody. Much appreciated. Just what I needed to hear. 'Till next time....
I DO appreciate the help
Logged
One Day At A Time
Pages: [1]   Go Up