i1io2 weirdness

[Erland]

Andrew, I agree. The iO is, although convenient, yet it does degrade your measurements. I have increased my patches to 9,5x9,5mm.

I did an average from 6 readings, didn't trust just one measuring, but next time I think I will create a chart for the regular i1Pro2 och measure it by hand instead. Think it will have less deltaE than the iO.

[Jeff-Grant]

One thing that I've noticed with the i0 after conversion and with the Pro 2 is that repeatability is good. I just went back and looked at a few old results. They all look good. On HPR, only one patch was 1.14 while all the others were well under 1. I'll attach the results from IGFS. This is with one sheet of paper on the io.

When I got the 3880, I did a lot of reprofiling. Initially, I was doing multiple passes and averaging with Profiler but after looking at the results in CT Pro, it didn't seem to need it. Maybe repeatability is another little detail that XRite neglected to mention. As always,I am happy to be corrected.