I have to admit that if I didn't already have a huge C645 system (almost everything they ever made but the 350 lens which isn't among my considerations), I wouldn't consider the adapter... But since I've tried it, I've also have to admit that if I didn't own the C645 system but was familiar of the lens properties, as I am... then I would most certainly do the same... My post was purely to share gained experience with people that don't... I tried my best to explain that resolution wise there is nothing worth considering to make the choice. But OTOH, I do know that the vast majority of "true" photographers are more than satisfied with the resolution they are now offered... Yet, I believe, that there's still a good part of very good photographers that don't think of resolution (as long as they already have more than they need) as being a first priority aspect when they choose a lens (I'm among them)... To them, I started this thread as to give them (the best I could) an idea of an alternative, which in my opinion is better too... and explain the reasons as to why I consider it as being better, so that they can judge themselves if my priorities match theirs...
OTOH. there is the big problem with many pros (me among them), where they have to carry lots of equipment to perform a certain task... Imagine for example one that has to carry all his FF system and all his MF and MFDBs and additionally his view camera and lenses for a project, just to use some of each system for parts of the project... Now what if the same pro. for the very same project, carries only his MF system, adds only a couple of FF bodies (one of them mirrorless) and a Cambo Actus (or Arca Universallis) with it and use his MF lenses for the lot? ...and then there is the matter of cost involved for that (very real) pro...