Howdy,
I have always liked my 24mm 2.8 D lens and under the proper circumstances quite amazing. I come from a film back ground and have not really had a lot of money to up grade until recently. Used to be primes were "always" better. I know I'm a late adapter mostly due to funds
I am curious if getting the 24-70mm will provide any clear IQ advantages. It costs roughly 5x more….
Any other options I should investigate for this range? I am happy with my 80-200 2.8 so looking for a mid-wide range zoom to take along.
I shoot a D700 and a D300s, mostly urban landscape but some street shooting.
Thanks!
Aztex
The 20mm and 24mm AFD lenses were pretty good, but the 28mm is marginal.
As to those 2 lenses there is a world of difference in size, weight, versatility. If you'r planning to get the 24-70mm f/2.8G and are asking if you can sell off the prime, then yes. The zoom is a little soft in the corners wide open, but otherwise a great lens if you are willing to carry it.
I have the 16-35mm f/4 VR, but kept the 20mm 2.8D because sometimes, I just pocket the little prime and have it with me when I don't think I need or can't carry the bigger zoom.