I further noticed on dpreview that image quality is best with the X-pro1(35mm), followed by the x-t1(56mm) and the quality of the E2(35mm) is far from that level.
At least in the test scenario from dpreview in raw.
In case of the x-t1 with the 56mm, the missing sharpness and detail in the hair and the green stuff could be because of the focal length and shallower dof.
The E2 though should be able to deliver the same dof as the x-pro1.
So I really wonder if there went something wrong.
Check yourselves:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x-t1/17I did download the raw and compared in Lightroom. I also converted them in Phocus...which did get me much better results.
Such a pitty the x-pro1 does not have face recognition
The camera feels good in hands and is a beauty