Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Tusqueetee Trees  (Read 1479 times)

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Tusqueetee Trees
« on: January 03, 2015, 10:25:22 pm »

Critique on what I did with this one would be appreciated. good/bad..
thanks, t
Logged
One Day At A Time

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2015, 10:35:36 pm »

I'm thinking you should give that swing a little more importance.

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2015, 04:47:59 am »

I'm thinking you should give that swing a little more importance.

I agree - or remove it altogether, as this seems to be a photograph of some rather lovely trees. I'd also be a lot less heavy-handed with the toning.

Jeremy
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2015, 05:55:45 am »

I don't know if the swing was a little off kilter. However if it was or wasn't I would straighten it up because it looks as if it is falling out of the frame. I certainly wouldn't take it out because it nicely adds something to the image that gives balance. Nice processing. As to the toning then I assume that was your vision and I wouldn't criticise it.

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2015, 10:17:51 am »

I'm thinking you should give that swing a little more importance.
I agree - or remove it altogether, as this seems to be a photograph of some rather lovely trees. I'd also be a lot less heavy-handed with the toning.

Jeremy
I don't know if the swing was a little off kilter. However if it was or wasn't I would straighten it up because it looks as if it is falling out of the frame. I certainly wouldn't take it out because it nicely adds something to the image that gives balance. Nice processing. As to the toning then I assume that was your vision and I wouldn't criticise it.
THANKS GUYS, All appreciated and agreed; I was 49/50 on toning at all, i liked it pure bw before, like this  -?   ....much better (I think).
« Last Edit: January 04, 2015, 10:20:45 am by Todd Suttles »
Logged
One Day At A Time

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2015, 10:20:46 am »

THANKS GUYS, All appreciated and agreed; I was 49/50 on toning at all, i liked it pure bw before, like this  -?

Well, I think that's much better. I prefer toning to be a lot more subtle; but as stamper says, it's really your vision that counts.

Jeremy
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2015, 11:06:22 am »

I would keep the toning (ok, maybe slightly less intense), keep the initial image slant, and remove the swing completely.

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2015, 04:22:17 pm »

I would keep the toning (ok, maybe slightly less intense), keep the initial image slant, and remove the swing completely.

Vr 03; swing gone, 50%tone; back to full frame, no crop. I liked the swing until I saw it without. The pot is enough to balance and keep me from following the water out of the frame. I think.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2015, 04:26:53 pm by Todd Suttles »
Logged
One Day At A Time

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2015, 04:41:33 pm »

Third try is the winner, IMHO. The trees are gorgeous, and the swing was irrelevant.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2015, 05:08:59 pm »

Much more interesting with the swing.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #10 on: January 04, 2015, 05:17:32 pm »

I maintain my first thought, the shot would be better with the swing a little more central; the last version is a nice picture and that's about it.

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #11 on: January 05, 2015, 03:35:39 am »

Much more interesting with the swing.

Agreed.

brandtb

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 972
    • http://www.brandtbolding.com
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2015, 12:23:28 pm »

Todd...there are lot of generic and non-interesting "things" in the frame and not any good elements really...what you have is basically an excercise in "toning" and toning itself does not always a good image make /B
Logged
Brandt Bolding
www.brandtbolding.com

Todd Suttles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 677
  • Hi, amateur learning my way...
    • Todd Suttles
Re: Tusqueetee Trees
« Reply #13 on: January 05, 2015, 12:38:21 pm »

Thanks everyone who took the time to contribute and help. I learned a lot about how to look at an image. much appreciated..... t
Logged
One Day At A Time
Pages: [1]   Go Up