If your profiles do not work correctly based solely on the measured data, then something is wrong with your system. "Adjusting" profiles like that defeats the whole purpose of profiles. What you wind up doing is post-processing the hard way.
I don't know what the current Datacolor system is like, but the profiles I generated a couple years ago with an earlier version are simply laughable. Almost every medium dark to dark color was automatically "out of gamut" even when profiles made with a better system had those areas easily within gamut. And the profiles were overall very red. I thought there was a problem with my particular puck, but a little googling showed the problem was common. The profile editor apparently came out of the need to correct for inadequate hardware.
I respectfully suggest you get a better system, assuming you are confident you are using the one you have correctly and there is not dust in the measuring port, you don't have some non-printing nozzles, etc.
Although manufacturer's profiles are sometimes not exactly terrific, they are generally better than I was ever able to get from my old system.