Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Pastels are in Vogue, So...  (Read 1324 times)

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Pastels are in Vogue, So...
« on: December 19, 2014, 01:28:54 pm »

Chicago skyline pano, first moments of a November sunrise, when colors are still muted, contrast soft, and the city still sleeping:


Chicago Skyline Panorama - Pastel Morning
by Slobodan Blagojevic, on Flickr

pcgpcg

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 490
    • paulglasser
Re: Pastels are in Vogue, So...
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2014, 06:40:19 pm »

Very nice!  At first I felt it had too much horizontal symmetry for my taste and I wanted to crop off the bottom third of the water.  When I did though I missed that wonderful expanse of water in the foreground that gives the city room to breathe.  Now I wonder what it would look like with a bit more foreground to set an even grander stage.  Very well done!
« Last Edit: December 19, 2014, 06:45:01 pm by pcgpcg »
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Pastels are in Vogue, So...
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2014, 07:31:27 pm »

Very nice!  At first I felt it had too much horizontal symmetry for my taste and I wanted to crop off the bottom third of the water.  When I did though I missed that wonderful expanse of water in the foreground that gives the city room to breathe.  Now I wonder what it would look like with a bit more foreground to set an even grander stage.  Very well done!

Thanks! That's the same thought process I had when I was framing the picture. I first started with 70mm of the 70-200/4 zoom (effectively 112mm), which was just about enough not to cut off antennas on the tallest buildings, but it felt crammed already in the viewfinder. So I switched to 17-55/2.8 zoom at 55mm and it gave it its "breathing space." I also tried cutingt off the lower third in post, but didn't ultimately, for the same reason.

One thing with panoramas' symmetry in general: putting the horizon in the middle is a good starting point if one wants to avoid geometric distortion of the verticals in the image. Also, not sure how tilting up and down would work while rotating the camera for 11 vertical shots. I didn't use any sophisticated pano device, just a simple ball head.

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Pastels are in Vogue, So...
« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2014, 07:51:57 pm »

Very nice, Slobodan. Don't mess with it. It's the way it should be right now.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Pastels are in Vogue, So...
« Reply #4 on: December 19, 2014, 08:27:55 pm »

It prints easily to 5'x20' canvas. A few details:

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Pastels are in Vogue, So...
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2014, 11:15:37 pm »

Very nice, Slobodan. Don't mess with it. It's the way it should be right now.
+1.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Pastels are in Vogue, So...
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2014, 05:17:11 am »

A very fine panorama. Lots of nice detail.

petermfiore

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2705
    • Peter Fiore Fine Art
Re: Pastels are in Vogue, So...
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2014, 08:35:16 am »

A wonderful shot. Well done all around.

Peter
Pages: [1]   Go Up