Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: out of nowhere prints are suddenly 2/3rds of a stop too dark (profiled system)  (Read 5201 times)

stevebri

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 220

There are some very clever people out there and I may need your input here...

My prints are now coming out the right colour, just 2/3rds of a stop too dark and I have no idea why...

I profile my Dell 2209WA every 4 or 5 weeks
I profile my papers and also profile each new box or roll when it comes in
I use a ColorMunki Photo
Lightroom 5.7 on windoze 7 64 bit
LR manages colours, Epson driver (7800) is set to 'no color adjustment'

What I have done so far..

Printed on both roll and sheet to confirm no dodgy paper (Canson Baryta photographique) result same problem on both sheet and roll
Printed via P/Shop and I get the exact same result (as I should)

Re profiled the monitor with a lower brightness... same result
Re profiled the papers... same result
uninstalled and re installed the monitor driver (it is/was latest version)

Monitor is what... 5 yrs old at most....

I print mostly B&W and the tones are bang on... no hints of green or magenta, true neutral B&W's (as you can get) and I have been happy with my colour managed loop for a long time...

Thoughts anyone....?

I'm not double profiling, got no issues with computer or printer...


My only thoughts are the screen must have gradually become just too bright and I need to bring the brightness as far down as possible... I'll do that now but if anyone has anything to add that might help (please don't bash the hardware, bash my incompetence instead)

Many thanks

S
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12512
    • http://www.markdsegal.com

The two thoughts that occur to me off the top of my head are:

(1) Did you by accident hit a control that brightened your display fooling you into adjusting the photos daker than they should be?

(2) If this outcome turned up just after a re-profiling, perhaps one of your new profiles is no good and you should go back to a previous one to check for that.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....."

Wayne Fox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4237
    • waynefox.com

Make sure where in the workflow the problem is coming from ... 1st step is to load up a known target reference file such as bill atkinsons, Andrew Rodney’s or Jack Flesher’s which is found at outbackphoto.com. I don’t have the links handy but should be able to find one through searching these forums or web search.

If it is dark on the display, and prints correctly, look at your display profile/luminosity setup.  If it looks good on the display and prints poorly then your printing workflow has something awry.
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12512
    • http://www.markdsegal.com

I could be missing something, but seems to me that both the Atkinson and Outback targets re no longer offered on their websites.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....."

Richowens

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 977


 Jack's image can be downloaded from the link below, it contains elements from Bill's test image so the two are almost the same.
http://www.jirvana.com/printer_tests/PrinterEvaluationImage_V002.zip

Rich
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12512
    • http://www.markdsegal.com

Super, that one is the same as the Outback - Jack and they obviously worked together on it with Bill's consent. It's a great target for these purposes.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....."

stevebri

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 220

Thanks so much for the early replies... all very helpful but not the answer to my problem.

I've tried a different image to test with (Jack's) I've tried different paper with a new profile for it... all still giving me darker prints.

I'm starting to think it's the monitor coming to the end of it's life... When I simply turn down the brightness to match the print it struggles to show much difference when getting darker, say the lower 30% (if 0 is dark and 100 is bright).  If I push the scale up to brightest, it starts to get bright 'easily' from 50-100.. If that makes sense.

So, just manually lowering the brightness and contrast after making an advanced monitor profile with ColorMunki (setting the luminance level to 90) Jack's print comes out as it should.

Also mine too with this manual tweak come out closer tahn before and not 2/3rd of a stop too dark..

I just don't feel comfortable having to manually tweak a good monitor after a good calibrator has done it's thing...

Anyone else experienced this ...?

Steve
Logged

Simon Garrett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 742

See Mark D Segal's first post:
  • If the prints are suddenly darker than they were, something must have suddenly changed, obviously.  It seems unlikely to be a gradual thing, like monitor ageing.  Can you think of anything about computer, monitor, software or workflow that might have changed?
  • Have you tried going back to a profile from before things went wrong?
Logged

Alan Goldhammer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4344
    • A Goldhammer Photography

I'm not familiar with the ColorMunki software so I may be asking the wrong question.  I use NEC Spectraview with my monitor and it allows me to set the intensity in cd/m(squared) and I never have to touch any of the monitor controls as the software controls everything (don't know if this is the same with the Dell model you have).  How does your calibration software set this?  Are you sure you are using the exact same intensity setting?  Regardless of the age of the monitor you should reliably be able to set the intensity; color response may be more of a factor as the monitor ages.  My NEC is four years old now and it's the only monitor I have (use it for general work stuff and photography).  I still get a reliable profile when I do it every six weeks with a low deltaE.  If the monitor is too bright and you have ruled out wrong settings, etc. I could be that your ColorMunki is not giving a reliable reading.

Certainly with the Flesher test print you should be able to cross check your monitor intensity setting.
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12512
    • http://www.markdsegal.com

I'm not familiar with the ColorMunki software so I may be asking the wrong question.  I use NEC Spectraview with my monitor and it allows me to set the intensity in cd/m(squared) and I never have to touch any of the monitor controls as the software controls everything (don't know if this is the same with the Dell model you have).  How does your calibration software set this?  Are you sure you are using the exact same intensity setting?  Regardless of the age of the monitor you should reliably be able to set the intensity; color response may be more of a factor as the monitor ages.  My NEC is four years old now and it's the only monitor I have (use it for general work stuff and photography).  I still get a reliable profile when I do it every six weeks with a low deltaE.  If the monitor is too bright and you have ruled out wrong settings, etc. I could be that your ColorMunki is not giving a reliable reading.

Certainly with the Flesher test print you should be able to cross check your monitor intensity setting.

By intensity, if talking cd/m^2 you mean display brightness I think. This is one of several parameters one sets before profiling the display. Once the profile is made, as no doubt you know, it is only valid for that set of parameters. If any of those basic parameters are changed by intent or by accident, the profile is no longer valid. A profile cannot go bad unless it somehow gets corrupted. More than likely, if the monitor were the problem and the problem were sudden, somehow or other parameters were interfered with. If the display parameters and profile cannot match the correct printed output of the printer target, and if resetting the parameters and reprofiling the display does not help, more than likely it is a monitor hardware problem. It would be useful for the OP to run a print of this target using "Let Printer Manage Colours", selecting the correct paper in the Printer Driver Dialog. It should produce a decent result - perhaps not optimal, but decent. If it doesn't, one would then suspect something wrong with the printer.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....."

Alan Goldhammer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4344
    • A Goldhammer Photography

Mark, I think we are saying the same thing.  I only have experience with NEC monitors and either ArgyllCMS or SpectraView software.  Either one establishes a profile that loads at boot up (Win7 OS) and I don't have to fool around with any controls.  Using the Flesher test print or any other one for that matter and printing it on a known paper with a manufacturer's profile (to make things easy) will give you a print that is very good and that you can compare to your display. It's certainly easy enough to re-profile the monitor.

One question for the OP, have you taken an image that printed correctly some time in the past where you have NOT made any changes to and printed it?  One would expect that this would be independent of a "monitor" problem and ought to have the right qualities.  Just want to rule out any problem with the printer.
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12512
    • http://www.markdsegal.com

Mark, I think we are saying the same thing.  I only have experience with NEC monitors and either ArgyllCMS or SpectraView software.  Either one establishes a profile that loads at boot up (Win7 OS) and I don't have to fool around with any controls. 

Yes we are, I just wanted to clarify for the OP, for avoidance of all doubt, that any intentional or accidental changes in the parameters invalidates the profile. It is easy for this to happen. I have an NEC PA271, and one needs to be very careful how one handles it - for example if you hold it in the wrong place on the sides if you are trying to reposition it, the brightness can get screwed-up accidentally because the control button is on a front-lower portion of the frame. Poor layout. Great display.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....."

Alan Goldhammer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4344
    • A Goldhammer Photography

Yes we are, I just wanted to clarify for the OP, for avoidance of all doubt, that any intentional or accidental changes in the parameters invalidates the profile. It is easy for this to happen. I have an NEC PA271, and one needs to be very careful how one handles it - for example if you hold it in the wrong place on the sides if you are trying to reposition it, the brightness can get screwed-up accidentally because the control button is on a front-lower portion of the frame. Poor layout. Great display.
LOL!!!  I've done the same thing myself with my 24" NEC.  It usually happens when I'm tilting it just before reprofiling so that the i1 puck will lie flat on the screen.
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12512
    • http://www.markdsegal.com

HAH! EXACTLY!

And just when we least need that screw-up.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....."

howardm

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1984

Spectraview allows you to lock the panel controls.............

Lock OSD (On Screen Display) controls when calibrated - selects if the monitor’s On Screen Display control buttons are locked when the monitor is calibrated. Locking the controls can be useful to prevent accidental or unauthorized adjustment of the monitor once it is calibrated. Options are:
• Don’t lock
• Lock all except Bright and Contrast
• Lock all
Note: The controls will be unlocked if the calibration is turned off in the main window.

Wayne Fox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4237
    • waynefox.com

Thanks so much for the early replies... all very helpful but not the answer to my problem.

So, just manually lowering the brightness and contrast after making an advanced monitor profile with ColorMunki (setting the luminance level to 90) Jack’s print comes out as it should.

Not sure what your are trying and what you are saying.  You are blaming your display ... did the print look good?  Why after making changes to your display would the print come out as it should?  That doesn’t make sense, the print shouldn’t change based on settings to the display.

The point of the target is to find where in the workflow the problem is.  You should load the file, and print it without any modifications.  It should come out perfect.  You never make adjustments to the file.

If the print comes out perfect, you then know your display profile and brightness setup need to be changed. Basically do what it takes to get the image on the display to  match the print you just made.  This can mean luminance, contrast, and white point. 

If the print comes out bad, then you have a problem with the printing workflow.  This doesn’t mean you also don’t have a problem with the display setup, but changing the display setup won’t cure this problem.  You need to make sure when you print the print, no matter what it looks like on the display, it prints correctly.  And this is by changing the workflow, not the file.
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12512
    • http://www.markdsegal.com

Not sure what your are trying and what you are saying.  You are blaming your display ... did the print look good?  Why after making changes to your display would the print come out as it should?  That doesn’t make sense, the print shouldn’t change based on settings to the display.

The point of the target is to find where in the workflow the problem is.  You should load the file, and print it without any modifications.  It should come out perfect.  You never make adjustments to the file.

If the print comes out perfect, you then know your display profile and brightness setup need to be changed. Basically do what it takes to get the image on the display to  match the print you just made.  This can mean luminance, contrast, and white point. 

If the print comes out bad, then you have a problem with the printing workflow.  This doesn’t mean you also don’t have a problem with the display setup, but changing the display setup won’t cure this problem.  You need to make sure when you print the print, no matter what it looks like on the display, it prints correctly.  And this is by changing the workflow, not the file.

Hi Wayne, yes correct advice. But I would add - where you say in italics "without any modifications" - for sure in respect of editing the file, but his printer colour management set-up still needs to be correct for the file to print as intended - no double colour management (either printer or the application -PS/LR) manages colour), correct paper profile selected if application manages colour, correct paper selected if printer manages colour. With these caveats the target should print accurately; if it does, to re-iterate - the problem is his display or its calibration/profiling; if it does not, he has a printer or printer colour management issue.
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....."

Wayne Fox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4237
    • waynefox.com

Hi Wayne, yes correct advice. But I would add - where you say in italics "without any modifications" - for sure in respect of editing the file, but his printer colour management set-up still needs to be correct for the file to print as intended
I thought that’s what I said.  Maybe I wasn’t clear enough, assuming it would be necessary to print it “correctly”.  But one thing you can never do is modify the file itself to try and make it look right.

So simple, print it out using correct settings.  If it looks bad, you have a problem ...  with those settings, the printer driver, corrupt profile ... something in the printing workflow is awry.  If it looks good, and looks bad on the display, then the display profile needs fixed.

But first thing that must happen is a good print produced without modifying the original file and using correct settings in the applications.  Until you can get that, everything/anything else that “works” is hacking around the problem, not fixing it.
Logged

AFairley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1486

Was there a sudden change in the lighting level in the OP's work area?  If the ambient light level decreased enough, prints that looked good on the screen would be printing dark even if monitor actual brightness was unchanged.  But the first place to start is by printing a reference image to rule out print pipeline problems.
Logged

digitaldog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20630
  • Andrew Rodney
    • http://www.digitaldog.net/

As Wayne and Mark have pointed out, the OP needs to focus on the issues and where they show up. The print is either too dark or it isn’t. That has zero to do with the display at this point. If one output’s a good reference image* and it’s too dark, the display isn’t the issue, the print settings, profile, user or something besides the RGB values are the issue.

* http://www.digitaldog.net/files/2014PrinterTestFileFlat.tif.zip
Logged
http://www.digitaldog.net/
Author "Color Management for Photographers".
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up