Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Great Falls National Park  (Read 1248 times)

Dave Pluimer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 166
    • Dave Pluimer Photography
Great Falls National Park
« on: November 11, 2014, 01:42:39 pm »

First real test of a new Arca-Swiss P0 head. The native file is over 10' long at 240 ppi.

Great Falls National Park, just outside of Washington, D.C..

Canon 6D, Canon 70-200 f/4 L IS, Formatt-Hitech 6-stop ND, 3-stop GND - 19 images - 116mm, f/8, 1.3s, ISO 400
Logged

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7394
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: Great Falls National Park
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2014, 01:56:07 pm »

Very good, thanks for sharing.

Walt Roycraft

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 442
    • roycraftart
Re: Great Falls National Park
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2014, 12:35:18 pm »

- 19 images -

I can't imagine 19 images. Love the location but find I am wanting more foreground.
Logged
Walter Roycraft
http://www.roycraftart.c

Dave (Isle of Skye)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2515
  • I've even written a book about it
    • SkyePhotoGuide.com
Re: Great Falls National Park
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2014, 02:04:38 pm »

First real test of a new Arca-Swiss P0 head. The native file is over 10' long at 240 ppi.

Great Falls National Park, just outside of Washington, D.C..

Canon 6D, Canon 70-200 f/4 L IS, Formatt-Hitech 6-stop ND, 3-stop GND - 19 images - 116mm, f/8, 1.3s, ISO 400

Hi Dave,

I also bought an Arca Swiss P0 head about 18 months ago, thought it might be better than my Acratech GV2, but couldn't get along with it, as it doesn't have an easy way to set up a level pan stitching set of shots, unless you invert it and then you lose the level, so I added a Novaflex Pano plate to the base of it, but then I found I didn't like how the "aspherical ball also creates a gravitational friction force thus preventing sudden camera deviation" works to stop easy movement of the camera into the vertical/portrait position, so I have only used it a couple of times and gone back to my old GV2. Although I must admit that the Arca Swiss geared locking mechanism is superb and very much stronger than the GV2, which on my head now slides about quite easily with the 70-200 mounted, but I have obviously become so used to the GV2, that I would now find any other head difficult to use without thinking - so, if anyone out there has a GV2 without mounting plate (I already have my own), that they want to swap for an almost new Arca Swiss P0 head and Novaflex pano plate, then please let me know  :)

But Dave, I really do hope the P0 is a good head for you and it is probably me that is not trying hard enough to get used to using the head, rather than anything wrong with it, as it has many rave reviews, so I suppose it comes down to the old saying of 'different horses for different courses' kind of thing and I am obviously a bit of an old mare in this respect...  ::)

Dave
« Last Edit: November 12, 2014, 02:14:13 pm by Dave (Isle of Skye) »
Logged

ErikKaffehr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11311
    • Echophoto
Re: Great Falls National Park
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2014, 03:14:29 pm »

Hi,

Yes, it seems half the image is missing. Lost in transmission?

Best regards
Erik

I can't imagine 19 images. Love the location but find I am wanting more foreground.
Logged
Erik Kaffehr
 

Dave Pluimer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 166
    • Dave Pluimer Photography
Re: Great Falls National Park
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2014, 04:02:30 pm »

It's a 1x5 aspect ratio.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Great Falls National Park
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2014, 09:13:12 pm »

I agree with Erik. I think it needs another 19 images to provide a lower half to the picture.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2798
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: Great Falls National Park
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2014, 09:25:42 pm »

I agree with Erik. I think it needs another 19 images to provide a lower half to the picture.


+1 (or is that +19?)
Logged
Terry McDonald - luxBorealis.com

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13794
Re: Great Falls National Park
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2014, 03:38:08 am »

I agree with Erik. I think it needs another 19 images to provide a lower half to the picture.


I agree 100%. When I "discovered " the panorama, I thought that the bottom of the image was missing.
Logged
Francois
Pages: [1]   Go Up