The question I am asking is whether there is documentation or anecdotal evidence that IS affects image sharpness when switched off and the lens is on a tripod.
I ask this because I have a several IS Canon lenses and have noted that when I shoot on a tripod with the IS switched off and the exposure is longer (1/15 or more) I can detect some softness in the images. This does not happen with my non-IS lenses. Also, I notice that when I use flash in studio or in the field my images are demonstrably sharper. I am wondering if this is due to the IS elements shaking on their mount as a consequence of mirror slap ( I guess I need to try some more tests).
Also, I noted that Canon did not offer IS on their new 24-70 2.8 L II and it is noted for its exceptional sharpness. Could this decision on their part be because of optical compromises necessitated by an IS design? I do note that Tamron does have VC on their lens and while it is well regarded most everyone agrees that it falls short of the Canon.