Levels of Membership

[brianrybolt]

What is the difference been a 'senior' member and a 'full' member?  What is it based on - How long a person has been a member and if so what are the lengths of time that defines different categories?  Or is it something else?
Thanks,  Brian

[Alan Smallbone]

Number of posts.

Alan

[stamper]

Now if it were the number of useful posts.....?

[Eric Myrvaagnes]

Now if it were the number of useful posts.....?

Perhaps there should be more categories, such as "Empty member?."

[ndevlin]

Or Flacid Member?

[Slobodan Blagojevic]

Or Flacid Member?

On the other hand, some members deserve erection of monument for their contribution.

[brianrybolt]

I thought you were going to say, 'In the other hand'.

[Slobodan Blagojevic]

I thought you were going to say, 'In the other hand'.

That would create a new membership level: upstanding member.

[LesPalenik]

Another distinction is the one between active (in other words "shooting") and expired members
 

[Slobodan Blagojevic]

Lets not forget measurebating members.

[stamper]

Another distinction is the one between active (in other words "shooting") and expired members
 

How do you know when somebody is deceased?

[Slobodan Blagojevic]

Another distinction is the one between active (in other words "shooting") and expired members

Les, I liked your original version better. So much so that I am going to shamelessly steel it: there are shooting and non-shooting members.

That is, there are those who photograph and share their work publicly, and there are others who do not photograph or share, but pontificate about it relentlessly.

[LesPalenik]

Slobodan, thanks for the approval and more elaborate interpretation, you are paying attention even to the smallest details.
I wrote and rewrote it late last night and was not sure about the best member classification. Now, there is no confusion, we made it very clear.