With all due respect that is BS.
I have been a professional art printer for 12 years and have gone through many iterations of big Epson printers since the very first 9000 and 10K printers were sold. Some of the most recent models have significant engineering design flaws while others did not.
I use my Epson, HP, and Canon 44" printers every day and only one of them, the newest, the Epson 9890 has given me headaches, with two nozzles now completely dead and much ink wasted in fucking with it. If I could pop out the head and put a new one in at a reasonable cost I would, but I can't, and they won't make them in a way that we can do that. It is a case of pay a fortune or throw the whole printer away, we all know this.
This is a problem that ALL of my colleagues have experienced in one form or another with the 9900 and 9890 series printers. These are not amateurs these are people who print every day as a business. And it is not happening for lack of use, it's a design flaw, and yes I think the very top people at Seiko should hear from not just one person but hundreds of them. Thanks for sending the email address.
john
And I agree, they have heard it many times ... but relative to the number of machines they sell and are in use it’s probably pretty insignificant. These printers really aren’t engineered for the use that most of us have for them, and the vast majority of epson users crank enough material through them they don’t have issues other than eventually wearing out ... which they plan for and replace.
[/quote]