A recent UK magazine reckoned that it was OK to shoot street without anybody in the frame and still be regarded as street. Candid head shots were Ok as well as posed. Quite a wide definition? I like this image and I wouldn't crop anything because it shows the environment he is living in.
The man is obviously acting up/posing for the camera but I think it is quite valid to capture his posing as a reaction to being photographed. What worries me is the area and objects in the left half of the image. What are they and why are they there?They don't seem to me to be relevant and I would crop the left third off. Roger
Here is another shot from that same day that shows the structure more clearly. Both color and B/W seem to work for this one. What do you think?