Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Capture NX-D, for free.  (Read 12336 times)

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4167
Capture NX-D, for free.
« on: July 16, 2014, 11:28:43 AM »

The official version of Capture NX-D (Ver. 1.0) released on July 15.
Logged

tuthill

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 48
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2014, 12:01:42 PM »

Based on my early attempts at using it I would say the price is about right.
Logged

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4167
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2014, 12:28:13 PM »

How uninformative.
Logged

TonyW

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 246
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2014, 02:10:08 PM »

Have not yet tried it but reports from some/many? users indicate not happy i.e. those that are already using NX2.  From what I can gather edits are not honoured between CNX2 and NX D and those that love control points more than a little upset. 

The move to sidecar files seems to have also upset some users. More important to me is that the sidecar files are proprietary and it will not be possible to read metadata in other programs - for the time being. 

Well done Nikon for once again trying the proprietary route in an effort to make the market your very own (well for your users!).  Question is why as NX-D is free?  Well for the moment at least? 
Logged

tuthill

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 48
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2014, 02:20:57 PM »

How uninformative.

I'm sorry.  It's slow and the interface is horrid.  The adjustment controls seem to be designed for simple adjustments.  No support for plugins.

Hopefully future versions will improve on this poor debut.
Logged

Simon Garrett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 631
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2014, 06:48:01 PM »

How uninformative.
If it was meant to be informative, you're quite right. 

But I suspect he was intending to give an opinion, not information.  And it's an opinion I share.  Nikon are a waste of space when it comes to software.  They should the job properly, or make it easier for others to do it by publishing full specs of the NEF data and other relevant information. 
Logged

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4167
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2014, 07:31:25 PM »

But I suspect he was intending to give an opinion, not information.

It would still have been uninformative.

That someone holds such-and-such-an-opinion is presumably of interest to them; but for others it only starts to become interesting when they explain why they hold such-and-such-an-opinion.
Logged

Simon Garrett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 631
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2014, 03:16:03 AM »

It would still have been uninformative.

That someone holds such-and-such-an-opinion is presumably of interest to them; but for others it only starts to become interesting when they explain why they hold such-and-such-an-opinion.


In the same way that your post is uninformative?
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4148
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2014, 03:40:48 AM »

Isaac, state your opinion on how good or bad it is otherwise people might think you are trolling. Personally I don't think you are but clearing up any doubts would be useful? :)

Simon Garrett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 631
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #9 on: July 17, 2014, 05:36:33 AM »

Isaac, state your opinion on how good or bad it is otherwise people might think you are trolling. Personally I don't think you are but clearing up any doubts would be useful? :)
Yes, and I apologise if my previous response to Isaac seemed rude, but it would be good to get his views, too. 
Logged

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4167
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #10 on: July 17, 2014, 10:24:04 AM »

Isaac, state your opinion on how good or bad it is

I don't have an opinion on how good or bad it is.

Stamper, state your opinion on how good or bad Capture NX-D is otherwise people might think you are trolling.
Logged

BernardLanguillier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9305
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/bernardlanguillier/sets/
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #11 on: July 17, 2014, 06:43:00 PM »

I would not call it a complete disaster, but there are some clear functional regressions compared to NX2, most obvious is the lack of U point technology (which remains in my view the most revolutionary image edition tool since layers).

It is reasonably responsive on my Mac Pro 2013 and colours seems as nice as they used to, but I will not make it my converter of choice.

Cheers,
Bernard
Logged
A few images online here!

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4148
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #12 on: July 18, 2014, 03:58:08 AM »

Isaac, I haven't downloaded it nor have I posted a link to it as you have done. Just to remind you, it was you that started a thread on the subject so it imo behoves you to comment on it? Simon I wasn't referring to you so no apology is required. Unfortunately the thread went into a tailspin after the reply #2

How uninformative.

Members can make up their own minds as to why it deteriorated.  :(

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4167
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #13 on: July 18, 2014, 09:46:07 AM »

Members can make up their own minds as to why it deteriorated.

Neither of your comments has been about Capture NX-D.

Other people (including tuthill) are making sensible comments about Capture NX-D.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2014, 11:23:33 AM by Isaac »
Logged

jwstl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 117
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #14 on: July 18, 2014, 12:08:30 PM »

If it was meant to be informative, you're quite right. 

But I suspect he was intending to give an opinion, not information.  And it's an opinion I share.  Nikon are a waste of space when it comes to software.  They should the job properly, or make it easier for others to do it by publishing full specs of the NEF data and other relevant information. 


To be fair, Nikon didn't actually create Capture NX-D; they gave it to someone else and they did it poorly.

http://nikonrumors.com/2014/03/24/yes-the-new-nikon-nx-d-software-is-made-by-silkypix.aspx/
Logged

Simon Garrett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 631
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #15 on: July 18, 2014, 12:13:47 PM »

Neither of your comments has been about Capture NX-D.

Other people (including tuthill) are making sensible comments about Capture NX-D.


Well, here are my comments about NX-D: It has about the same functionality as View NX, but with a better user interface (and better than NX2).  It doesn't have the degree of raw convertor control as, for example, Lightroom/ACR, or the late lamented Aperture and NX2.  It allows limited tweaking of exposure, WB, highlights and so on.

A plausible workflow is to use NXD to tweak the camera control settings, then export to TIF/jpeg for further editing.

However, to me this misses the enormous advantage of raw, which is to carry out as much editing as possible on the raw image.  The raw image has so much more potential than Tif, let alone a jpeg, in terms of dynamic range and potential to alter WB and tonal balance.  NX-D forces you into a linear workflow of (1) raw conversion, (2) other editing, including localised editing.  I find the more iterative approach of Lightroom much, much, more powerful. 

NX-D has the advantage that it's Nikon's raw convertor, and Nikon know more about the sensor than anyone else - at least initially, until others have done the experimentation wouldn't be needed if Nikon weren't so pointlessly secretive. 

I shall keep NX-D loaded so I can use it occasionally for a "reference Nikon raw conversion".  Where I have difficulty getting what I want from Adobe conversion, I'll try NX-D to see if I'm missing something. But I doubt it will have any part in my regular workflow.

You may or may not regard my comments as correct, but if you think they're not "sensible", well let's avoid letting this conversation deteriorate in ways neither you nor I want it to.
Logged

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4167
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #16 on: July 18, 2014, 12:23:27 PM »

Thanks for that information.

NX-D forces you into a linear workflow of (1) raw conversion, (2) other editing, including localised editing.  I find the more iterative approach of Lightroom much, much, more powerful.

That seems similar to working with RawTherapee - additional software is required for selective editing.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2014, 12:39:25 PM by Isaac »
Logged

Lupin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 61
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #17 on: July 20, 2014, 11:35:37 AM »

I've tried NX-D and I don't like it at all.

It won't read Capture NX2 edits.
Any file that's already been edited in Capture NX2 has to be 'restored' before NX-D can do anything.
Sidecar files & folders are a major hassle.
NX-D loses its edits if anything happens to the corresponding sidecar file or PARAM folder.
There's no way to add plugins (if there is, I haven't found it).
Nothing else will read the NX-D sidecar format (.nksc).
NX-D cannot do what Capture NX2 can do (U-point etc, etc, etc).
Capture NX2 can have any number of files open for editing at the same time - NX-D can't.


The only good thing about NX-D is that I didn't pay any money for it.  >:(

 
Logged

Lupin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 61
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #18 on: July 20, 2014, 11:43:52 AM »

PS to above.

Oh, and NX-D is prone to locking up, whereupon you lose the edit completely.
Logged

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4167
Re: Capture NX-D, for free.
« Reply #19 on: July 20, 2014, 12:21:21 PM »

We're those Beta versions or the release?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up