Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Street Singer  (Read 967 times)

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Street Singer
« on: June 27, 2014, 06:34:10 pm »

.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Street Singer
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2014, 04:17:26 am »

Overall I like this but I'm not sure if the man in the white shirt is a distraction? The eye is drawn to him first rather than female musician. An image that I would have to look at again to make up my mind.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Street Singer
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2014, 10:06:14 am »

Overall I like this but I'm not sure if the man in the white shirt is a distraction? The eye is drawn to him first rather than female musician. An image that I would have to look at again to make up my mind.
That bothers me too.

The only way I can make sense of the image as presented is if it is a metaphor about the difficulty (the wall) an artist (the singer) has about reaching a potential audience (the man in white). But the tonalities suggest that the man is more important than the singer.

If the purpose is to be unsettling, than it certainly works.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Street Singer
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2014, 11:42:13 am »

Okay. You both are right. I'm happy to see this kind of criticism --  that deals with composition rather than post-processing. Here are two alternatives. (I cropped. I'll have to confess to the ghost of HCB.)
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Street Singer
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2014, 02:40:40 pm »

Now you've made it harder, Russ.

The square shot is now a lovely, sensitive portrait, and the background and lines on the ground leading to her make a very nice composition. But it doesn't really have the "ambiguity" that you want in "street." So I classify it as a fine portrait, but not "street."

In the new vertical shot, I'm glad you made the guy go home and change his shirt.  ;)
Now the tonal balance between the singer and the passerby is much better, and this shot does retain the ambiguity that invites the viewer to try out a variety of readings. So, since I tend to prefer complexity over simplicity (as in the Choir rehearsal shots), I now find I have a modest preference for this new version.

Am I right to say this is now "street?" After all, I generally only do pretty landscapes and abstracts myself, and occasional photos of streets, but never "street," since it's too hard.   ;)

Eric
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Street Singer
« Reply #5 on: June 29, 2014, 04:09:52 pm »

Hi Eric, Yes, I'd call the vertical "street," but it would be better street if there were a bit more ambiguity there. It just seemed a pleasant thing as I passed by, but I spun the lens up to f/11 to catch the guy in the background and make it a street shot.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Street Singer
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2014, 10:39:29 am »

Russ, both are an "improvement". I prefer the one with just the girl singer.
Pages: [1]   Go Up