Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber  (Read 8978 times)

ErikKaffehr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9829
    • Echophoto
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #40 on: June 29, 2014, 03:10:41 PM »

Hi,

I was on a workshop in the Dolomites with Hans Krause, we had two friends from a nordic country taking part. The two had very different aspiration one was looking for subtle tones the other for more pronounced tonal interpretation. We have different perception and interpretation, having that liberty is a part of the fun.

Best regards
Erik


My personal tastes run to images that don't make you think of the processing. Nantucket is saturated enough, it doesn't need any help from me. And for our documentary work, I'm very careful not to overly edit the scene. I usually add a little contrast/clarity and noise reduction and brighten as needed to clearly see. At the same time, we try to use our artistic sensibilities.

But I don't find online criticism to be particularly helpful. As David said, it tends to want to make the photograph into one the critic would have taken. If you read critique forums, the same advice is offered over and over - look like the herd.  I prefer to observe first hand when I am receiving criticism. I can see the person's expression, hear their tone of voice, watch what they really react to and what leaves them cold. To say that to post my work online means I have to receive random criticism from anonymous people, to open my heart to that negativity, I say no thanks. I don't think Kevin or Michael should have to endure it either. I don't think they owe anybody that.

I think the culture of distant criticism the internet has produced is not good for artists.

Sharon

Telecaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1608
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #41 on: June 29, 2014, 03:14:07 PM »

I'm with Sharon on this one. Online critique is typically little more than a thinly veiled proclamation of one's own creative or æsthetic superiority. Good and useful critique IMO involves trying to get into the head, or at least in tune with the sensibility, of the person whose work you're critiquing.

-Dave-
Logged

jjj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4738
    • http://www.futtfuttfuttphotography.com
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #42 on: June 29, 2014, 04:49:37 PM »

So far, from the comments in this thread, I'm getting the impression that many of those who like Kevin's image, Heavy Metal, do so because they have some past, pleasant association with heavy, industrialized equipment, and have perhaps once worked, or continue to work, in a comfortable office in a water-works complex, nuclear reactor, or other environment with heavy machinery.

For me, the associations that Heavy Metal invoke are of a Dickensian, child slavery environment, an ear-damaging, constant clatter of machinery, and a drab, mind-numbing  decor.
What you really need to try and appreciate is that just because you view and rationalise the world in a particular way, it may have absolutely no bearing on how others enjoy or dislike things.
I like industrial shots and similar imagery and have done since I was a kid. Without any of the associations you think are needed to appreciate such stuff. Though occasionally I used the toilet and as pipes were needed to carry waste away maybe that's it!  ;) But seeing as we all use plumbing, shouldn't we all like images with pipes in them Ray?

As I said above people usually like what they like, because that is what they like. Sometimes things are that simple.
Logged
Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography

jjj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4738
    • http://www.futtfuttfuttphotography.com
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #43 on: June 29, 2014, 04:50:34 PM »

I'm with Sharon on this one. Online critique is typically little more than a thinly veiled proclamation of one's own creative or æsthetic superiority. Good and useful critique IMO involves trying to get into the head, or at least in tune with the sensibility, of the person whose work you're critiquing.
Indeed.
Logged
Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography

barryfitzgerald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 684
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #44 on: June 30, 2014, 07:56:58 AM »

Sometimes it's not what is said but how it is said. I would be offended if someone called my work "awful"
As for the photos down to taste, I don't care much for the HDR shots (not a fan of HDR in general unless it's subtle), but quite like the others, even though it's not a subject I would have much interest in, I can still find something of value there.

I've had forum jousts before and you do toughen up a bit over time. Photography is a taste thing, you can't please everyone so you just have to please yourself. I would never use the word awful for anyone though even a rank newbie with really bad photos, it's just not helpful or constructive in any way
Logged

michael

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5084
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #45 on: June 30, 2014, 08:17:15 AM »

Simply saying that one likes something or dislikes it tells others nothing about the object being critiqued. What it does do is tell us more than a little about the person making the critique.

Michael
Logged

petermfiore

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1047
    • Peter Fiore Fine Art
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #46 on: June 30, 2014, 08:45:49 AM »

Simply saying that one likes something or dislikes it tells others nothing about the object being critiqued. What it does do is tell us more than a little about the person making the critique.

Michael

Always! A truth all artists need to keep in mind. Another way to think of it as " consider the source".

Peter
Logged
www.peterfiore.com

Canvas Colors Brushes  

A life in Art >  www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRsNaNM0ZeU

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9361
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #47 on: June 30, 2014, 08:46:48 AM »

Simply saying that one likes something or dislikes it tells others nothing about the object being critiqued. What it does do is tell us more than a little about the person making the critique.

Michael


Michael
Could you amplify on that concept. We frequently get comments about photos, such as 'Great shot', 'Nice shot', 'I like that', 'Well done!' etc.

Would you infer from such comments that the people making the comments have good taste? Or would you infer that such people are sometimes trying to please and curry favour, or make friends. In other words, basically being hypocritical.

My own view is that any comment is only useful if it's an honest comment, without bias and favour. It's even more useful if it's accompanied with some rational reason supporting the opinion.
Logged

jfirneno

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 60
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #48 on: June 30, 2014, 11:01:44 AM »

I don't usually post negative comments about images, but Kevin has now posted a number of similar images on the home page depicting industrial scenes. No-one has commented on them, as far as I'm aware, yet he continues to post them.

I don't like them, Kevin. They're awful. I can only presume that you've never encountered such scenes in real life before, and perhaps find them fascinating because they appear so unusual to you. Is this correct? Alternatively, perhaps in the past you have worked in such an environment, and have emotional memories that these images inspire. Which is correct?

Sorry to be so negative.  :)

I have a question for the more veteran forum residents.  I guess I can't quantify exactly who that would be but let's say folks with several thousand forum replies.  My question is does it seem likely that someone who has been on this forum for a very long time could be unaware that some people like photography with industrial equipment as a subject?  Going through the OP's statements it appears to be an aggressive assertion that these themes are ugly to all right minded artists and only some kind of psychological quirk can explain an interest in them.  I ask this question because it seems to me that this is either an indirect attack on the photographer who created the images (for whatever reason) or a declaration of what should be displayed on this website (specifically only more naturalistic themes like mountains and trees).  If this is a long-running argument it would be interesting to me to catch up on the scorecard.
Regards,
John
Logged

michael

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5084
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #49 on: June 30, 2014, 11:09:15 AM »

Michael
Could you amplify on that concept. We frequently get comments about photos, such as 'Great shot', 'Nice shot', 'I like that', 'Well done!' etc.

Would you infer from such comments that the people making the comments have good taste? Or would you infer that such people are sometimes trying to please and curry favour, or make friends. In other words, basically being hypocritical.

My own view is that any comment is only useful if it's an honest comment, without bias and favour. It's even more useful if it's accompanied with some rational reason supporting the opinion.

The point that I'm making is that just stating an opinion does not provide any useful information, other that what you as one individual happen to think. As I wrote, it tells more about you than about the photographer (artist) or the work.

Saying "Nice shot" or similar is no different than saying "I hate it." Frankly, why should I, or anyone for that matter care what you think?

If one wants to provide useful criticism that makes me care then starting a discussion about the nature of the subject, the composition, the presentation and so forth has value. The creator of the image and others are still just left with what you think, but at least they have an indication of your thought process, which may be of interest or value.

When we read a proper book or movie review we learn something about both the subject and the reviewer. Casual commentary doesn't have to rise to the standard of a formal review, but it should do more than just opine. Also, insulting the creator of the work just isn't a good may to win friends and influence people.

Michael


Michael
Logged

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3128
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #50 on: June 30, 2014, 11:17:55 AM »

Would you infer from such comments that…
  • they're being sociable
  • they liked the photo



Logged

Peter McLennan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1897
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #51 on: June 30, 2014, 11:34:30 AM »

So far, from the comments in this thread, I'm getting the impression that many of those who like Kevin's image, Heavy Metal, do so because they have some past, pleasant association with heavy, industrialized equipment, and have perhaps once worked, or continue to work, in a comfortable office in a water-works complex, nuclear reactor, or other environment with heavy machinery.

Not me.

I just love the image.  I don't care what processing he did, either.  It's just friggin' gorgeous.  I wish I'd shot it.
Logged

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9361
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #52 on: June 30, 2014, 12:27:56 PM »

Saying "Nice shot" or similar is no different than saying "I hate it." Frankly, why should I, or anyone for that matter care what you think?
Michael


Good question. If no-one cares whether his image is liked or disliked, or cares what anyone thinks about it, then why show it? Keep it to yourself.

Quote
If one wants to provide useful criticism that makes me care then starting a discussion about the nature of the subject, the composition, the presentation and so forth has value. The creator of the image and others are still just left with what you think, but at least they have an indication of your thought process, which may be of interest or value.

I did. I initially described a dislike for the image, and I later described why I disliked it, in post #28, as follows:
"the associations that Heavy Metal invoke are of a Dickensian, child slavery environment, an ear-damaging, constant clatter of machinery, and a drab, mind-numbing decor".

Kevin later tried to justify his image by associating it with Burtynsky's industrial landscapes. I replied that I didn't see the patterns and symmetry in Kevin's shot that typify Burtinsky's shots, and make them interesting.

What's the problem?

Logged

Isaac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3128
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #53 on: June 30, 2014, 01:14:26 PM »

If no-one cares whether his image is liked or disliked, or cares what anyone thinks about it, then why show it?

For others to appreciate or not, as they please.


What's the problem?

The problem is that your personal dislike of the picture content isn't sufficient to support a discussion.
Logged

Pete Berry

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 374
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #54 on: June 30, 2014, 01:36:29 PM »


I don't like them, Kevin. They're awful. I can only presume that you've never encountered such scenes in real life before, and perhaps find them fascinating because they appear so unusual to you. Is this correct? Alternatively, perhaps in the past you have worked in such an environment, and have emotional memories that these images inspire. Which is correct?


Ray, I'm truly sorry that you were either, (A), abducted as a child to a similar place, or (B), forced to work in a similar environment against your will to "experience the emotional memories these images..." invoke in you. Which is correct? And, oh, have you stopped beating your wife?

You have, in a short, ugly message, completely destroyed the cardinal role of personal taste in art appreciation, and substituted simplistic, utterly narrow-minded criteria to explain why anyone might possibly appreciate something you don't.  ;) That makes it OK, right?

I am intrigued by images such as this, and congratulate Kevin on his work. As always, I would like to see links to appreciate the homepage images on a somewhat larger scale.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2014, 09:57:59 PM by Pete Berry »
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 8907
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #55 on: June 30, 2014, 01:39:15 PM »


... I did. I initially described a dislike for the image, and I later described why I disliked it, in post #28...

Seriously, Ray!? 28 posts later!?

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 8907
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #56 on: June 30, 2014, 01:41:56 PM »

... I don't like them...They're awful...

I couldn't agree more, Ray!

I do not like them either, they are indeed awful. Your critiques, that is.

jjj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4738
    • http://www.futtfuttfuttphotography.com
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #57 on: June 30, 2014, 07:33:27 PM »

The problem is that your personal dislike of the picture content isn't sufficient to support a discussion.
True. Except for the fact that the discussion is now 4 pages long.
This could a repeat of the utterly absurd + ridiculous "lenses change perspective, not position" nonsense discussion from a while back.
Logged
Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography

jjj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4738
    • http://www.futtfuttfuttphotography.com
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #58 on: June 30, 2014, 07:55:21 PM »

This is an oldie but still so true - http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/2006/06/great-photographers-on-internet.html
Even better was when someone posted a bunch of photos by similar 'old masters' for open critique. May also have been from TOP, but cannot recall off hand.
Logged
Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography

Kevin Raber

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 625
  • Kevin Raber
    • Kevin Raber
Re: Heavy Metal by Kevin Raber
« Reply #59 on: June 30, 2014, 09:39:34 PM »

There is nothing more fun than to sit down and discuss photographs.  I enjoy this a lot when shooting too.  As anyone who has shot with me can attest I verbalize what I am seeing.  So, anytime any of you are in Indianapolis let me know, stop by and we can discuss photography to our hearts content and maybe even enjoy a glass of wine.  Or, come to one of the workshops that we do and we'll enjoy great discussions on numerous topics.  We might even have a laugh or two. 

Kevin

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Up