Topic: road to the hill (Read 1621 times)

Jeremy Roussak · « **on:** June 19, 2014, 02:46:03 pm »

At least I wasn't run over...

Does a square crop improve it?

Jeremy

Slobodan Blagojevic · « **Reply #1 on:** June 19, 2014, 03:13:06 pm »

I think it does.

Do I sense a slight barrel distortion?

Eric Myrvaagnes · « **Reply #2 on:** June 19, 2014, 03:40:36 pm »

I prefer the square, too. There's more room for the scene to breathe.

francois · « **Reply #3 on:** June 20, 2014, 02:31:07 am »

Square, no question! In the portrait version, the hill is too far. The road portion is too large and doesn't bring much to the scene.

Rajan Parrikar · « **Reply #4 on:** June 21, 2014, 03:54:19 pm »

Looks like the Wilson Cliffs just outside Las Vegas in the Red Rocks area.

Jeremy Roussak · « **Reply #5 on:** June 23, 2014, 03:58:42 am »

Quote from: Rajan Parrikar on June 21, 2014, 03:54:19 pm

Looks like the Wilson Cliffs just outside Las Vegas in the Red Rocks area.

I didn't know that what why they were called, Rajan, but you've got the location.

Slobodan, I'm not sure what you're looking at. There shouldn't be barrel distortion, as the 24-105 was at 88mm and I had the LR lens correct enabled which I would hope would have caught anything remaining.

Jeremy

David Anderson · « **Reply #6 on:** July 02, 2014, 03:27:03 am »

The square crop works well.

I don't really see any distortion - maybe the slight rise of the road gives that impression ?

Author Topic: road to the hill (Read 1621 times)

Jeremy Roussak

road to the hill

Slobodan Blagojevic

Re: road to the hill

Eric Myrvaagnes

Re: road to the hill

francois

Re: road to the hill

Rajan Parrikar

Re: road to the hill

Jeremy Roussak

Re: road to the hill

David Anderson

Re: road to the hill