I've done enough experimenting to understand that right/lower zero padding of the image and the kernels prior to FFT yields, after multiplication and inverse FFT, a rightward and downward shift of the synthetically convolved image of (kernelSize - 1) / 2 pixels. This would be no problem if the kernels were the same in each color plane of the image, since the output image could be brought back into register by cropping.

However, in my case, since I'm using different kernels for different planes to simulate diffraction, the shifting of the round trip through the FFT causes the planes of the output image to be out of registration with each other, which causes errors in the SFR analysis.

As I see it, I have two choices. I could keep track of the kernel sizes in each plane while I'm multiplying in the frequency domain, and shift the planes of the image after the inverse FFT. I've tested this in isolation, and it works. Alternatively, I could set up the Airy disk kernels so they're all the same pixel size, the size of the red one. The blue one will just have more rings. Right now they all have the same number of rings: 10.

I'm liking the latter approach better, since it seems less susceptible to programming errors.

I'll report back when I've results.

If anybody thinks I'm on the wrong track, sing out, please.

Jim