Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Manny, Moe and Jane  (Read 595 times)

Chris Calohan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3509
  • Editing Allowed
Manny, Moe and Jane
« on: May 03, 2014, 03:22:12 pm »

At a local arts festival. I had to use a longer lens simply because of the large masses of crowds made it almost impossible to get right up on a group like this.
Logged
If it Ain't Broke, Leave it Alone; if it is Broke, Fix it; if it's a Maybe, Play With it - Who Knows

PeterAit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4559
    • Peter Aitken Photographs
Re: Manny, Moe and Jane
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2014, 04:21:12 pm »

IMO, nice try, but having all 3 people's faces turned away really ruins it. Isn't it the faces of people that we are interested in?
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Manny, Moe and Jane
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2014, 04:49:56 pm »

In this case I'd say it's the bellies!
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Manny, Moe and Jane
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2014, 04:51:59 pm »

Chris, if you're gonna do street you gotta get rid of that long lens and pop a 50 on the camera. And yes, in most, but not all cases you need to see people's faces. About the only time that's not true is if the picture shows you what they're looking at.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.
Pages: [1]   Go Up