Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: rocks and sky  (Read 704 times)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
rocks and sky
« on: April 21, 2014, 03:19:45 pm »

Comments welcome, as usual.

Jeremy
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: rocks and sky
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2014, 03:41:03 pm »

Too much Clarity (?) for me. The distant mountain shade of blue also kind of too much?

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: rocks and sky
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2014, 04:30:14 pm »

+1
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13794
Re: rocks and sky
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2014, 06:26:43 am »

Too much Clarity (?) for me. The distant mountain shade of blue also kind of too much?

Exactly… but I like the framing a lot.
Logged
Francois

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: rocks and sky
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2014, 03:02:25 pm »

Too much Clarity (?) for me. The distant mountain shade of blue also kind of too much?

Fair points: I've reduced the clarity a little (it's an HDR image, which perhaps explains why it looks as if it has too much). I've also reduced the saturation on the mountains: they really were that blue (in that I've not fiddled with the saturation at al), but I suppose it appears excessive.

Jeremy
Logged

seamus finn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1243
Re: rocks and sky
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2014, 03:38:32 pm »

Lurid is a word that springs to mind.
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: rocks and sky
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2014, 05:55:36 pm »

I wasn't there, but this looks better to me.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: rocks and sky
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2014, 07:25:04 pm »

I like Bruce's variant.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: rocks and sky
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2014, 04:13:45 am »

I wasn't there, but this looks better to me.

I can see that aesthetically it might, but I have to say that it doesn't reflect my memories of the scene: it has a greenish hue, and the colours were pretty lurid, particularly as the sun rose. Brighter is good, though.

It was taken from the ledge in Arches NP from which one takes the classic shot of Turret Arch through the North Window. The ledge was crowded that morning and I was fairly late, so I didn't get far enough to the left to get a clean view; I'll post later what I did manage.

Jeremy
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up