Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Bridge Walkers  (Read 1525 times)

seamus finn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1243
Bridge Walkers
« on: April 14, 2014, 01:26:53 pm »

This is a slice of Sydney's iconic bridge. Is it a tourist shot?

« Last Edit: April 14, 2014, 01:28:27 pm by seamus finn »
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2014, 02:12:24 pm »

A great shot, Seamus! Love it. Can't think of a single nip or tuck that would improve it.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2014, 02:49:57 pm »

May I?

seamus finn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1243
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2014, 03:15:58 pm »

An interesting interpretation, SB.
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2014, 03:33:33 pm »

May I?

The correct answer should be "Not only 'no,' but 'HELL NO!'" That picture needs the wide bridge span with people isolated near the middle. Cropped, it's nothing special. Why is it that everybody thinks it's important to zero in on a single point? Very often surroundings are as important as or more important than the focal point.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #5 on: April 14, 2014, 04:32:11 pm »

The correct answer should be "Not only 'no,' but 'HELL NO!'" That picture needs the wide bridge span with people isolated near the middle. Cropped, it's nothing special. Why is it that everybody thinks it's important to zero in on a single point? Very often surroundings are as important as or more important than the focal point.

I regretted it the moment I posted it, but not for your reasons above. Mostly because I am reluctant to fiddle with work  of accomplished photographers, assuming they had a reason to present it the way they did. So, see it rather not as a critique of Seamus' work, but what I would have done with that file.

My approach is based on the same wide bridge span you are talking about, except I see it as a distraction, because it curves down and out, effectively leading the viewer out of the image too quickly, without giving him a chance to even notice the people (I did not initially). The horizontal format also divides the image in two, almost unrelated parts, given the large negative space in between. The vertical format tightens the composition, imho. The increased contrast also serves to accentuate the main elements, i.e., bridge, people, helicopters, rather than drown them in a rhapsody in gray.

Seamus, if my intervention is not welcome or acceptable for whatever reason, I will remove it (and this commentary as well).

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #6 on: April 14, 2014, 04:48:38 pm »

I regretted it the moment I posted it, but not for your reasons above. Mostly because I am reluctant to fiddle with work  of accomplished photographers, assuming they had a reason to present it the way they did. So, see it rather not as a critique of Seamus' work, but what I would have done with that file.

My approach is based on the same wide bridge span you are talking about, except I see it as a distraction, because it curves down and out, effectively leading the viewer out of the image too quickly, without giving him a chance to even notice the people (I did not initially). The horizontal format also divides the image in two, almost unrelated parts, given the large negative space in between. The vertical format tightens the composition, imho. The increased contrast also serves to accentuate the main elements, i.e., bridge, people, helicopters, rather than drown them in a rhapsody in gray.

Seamus, if my intervention is not welcome or acceptable for whatever reason, I will remove it (and this commentary as well).

Yeah, but you made the "negative space in between" larger, not smaller.  I think bridges need to span and if you made the helicopters bigger [instead of smaller] and pushed them down on the people and repeated the bridge and people in mirrored form at the top,...  

but I notice the people right off anyway.

Bruce
« Last Edit: April 14, 2014, 04:50:46 pm by Bruce Cox »
Logged

seamus finn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1243
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #7 on: April 15, 2014, 12:39:02 am »

[quoteSeamus, if my intervention is not welcome or acceptable for whatever reason, I will remove it (and this commentary as well)][/quote]

No worries, SB leave it there.
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #8 on: April 15, 2014, 09:42:15 am »

Slobodan, I've got to apologize for overreacting to your crop. I think your edits are correct more often than they're incorrect, but this time I think you were wrong, and seriously so. What Seamus shot was a long, curved bridge with a gathering of people at the peak of the curve, and the sky above the people full of choppers. From what I can see of the choppers this could be Vietnam in the sixties. I have to wonder why those people are gathered at the center of the bridge, why there aren't more people near the ends of the bridge, and where the ends of the bridge go. But the crop has the people occupying a short bridge, and evidently there to view the choppers. The mystery is gone. I'd also argue that raising the tone of the sky helps to remove the mystery. Let's face it, mystery is the heart of this photograph. There's a lot of it in the original but almost none in the crop.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #9 on: April 15, 2014, 10:33:32 am »

For once I'm with Russ and not Slobodan.

Fine, evocative photo!

(I was thinking the seagulls look a bit strange, four wings each.    ??? )
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #10 on: April 15, 2014, 10:51:17 am »

-

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #11 on: April 15, 2014, 10:53:27 am »

You aren't thinking of taking another holiday? ;D I am sure that Russ will "stumble" sometime and you will get your "revenge" ;) :)

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #12 on: April 15, 2014, 11:07:01 am »

You aren't thinking of taking another holiday? ;D I am sure that Russ will "stumble" sometime and you will get your "revenge" ;) :)

Thanks for the comforting words, but no, no hope for me, Stamper.

How can Russ ever stumble when he never crops? He is, by definition, always right. Just like a stopped clock is always more precise than even the most accurate atomic clock: it shows absolutely correct time twice a day.

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #13 on: April 15, 2014, 11:07:19 am »

There's no doubt about it, Stamper. I've been shot down in flames before and I'm sure it'll happen again when the flak gets heavy.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Bridge Walkers
« Reply #14 on: April 15, 2014, 11:38:33 am »

Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)
Pages: [1]   Go Up